Advertisement

Issues relating to the meaning of psychology as a science

  • Amedeo Giorgi
Chapter
Part of the International Institute of Philosophy / Institut International de Philosophie book series (COPH, volume 2)

Abstract

In Philosophy in the Mid-Century Mace and Peters [1] discussed the relationship between philosophy and psychology in terms of three categories: (1) conceptual analysis, (2) methodology, and (3) empirical studies of philosophical interest. Under the category of ‘conceptual analysis’ the authors discussed the concepts and categories that scholars need to clarify the notion of ‘mind.’ In Contemporary Philosophy Otero [2] discussed the philosophical problems of scientific psychology in terms of one fundamental dichotomy: scientific psychology, in the strict sense, and the challenge it was receiving at that time from varied inspirations that he grouped under the heading of ‘total psychology,’ a label he invented to characterize those viewpoints critical of strict scientific psychology because of its narrow approach to the subject matter of psychology.

Keywords

Subject Matter American Psychologist Contemporary Philosophy Human Reality Philosophical Anthropology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [11]
    Argyris, C. Some Unintended Consequences of Rigorous Research. Psychological Bulletin 70 (1968): 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [7]
    Bakan, D. The Mystery-Mastery Complex in Contemporary Psychology. American Psychologist 20 (1965): 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [41]
    Bandura, A. Behavior Therapy and Models of Man. American Psychologist 29 (1974): 859–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [16]
    Barker, E.N. Humanistic Psychology and the Scientific Method. Interpersonal Development 2 (1971–72): 137–172.Google Scholar
  5. [37]
    Baron, J. Is Experimental Psychology Relevant? American Psychologist 26(1971): 713–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [20]
    Bartley, S.H. Defining the Rubrics of Psychology. Canadian Psychologist 15 (1974): 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [24]
    Beshai, J.A. Psychology’s Dilemma: To Explain or To Understand. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1 (1971): 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [57]
    Blanshard, B. The Problem of Consciousness — A Debate. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1966–67): 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [25]
    Bonner, H. On Being Mindful of Man, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. [30]
    Braginsky, B.M., and Braginsky, J.S. Mainstream Psychology: A Critique. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. [22]
    Brandt, L.W. Scientific Psychology: What for? Canadian Psychological Review 16 (1975): 28–34.Google Scholar
  12. [46]
    Brentano, F. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint New York: Humanities Press, 1973 (originally in German, 1874).Google Scholar
  13. [59]
    Casier, L. The ‘Consciousness Problem’ Is Not the Problem. Perceptual and Motor Skills 42 (1976): 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [27]
    Chein, J. The Science of Behavior and the Image of Man. New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. [50]
    Clark, K.E., and Miller, G.A. (Eds.) Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  16. [33]
    Cole, J.F., and Arnold, W.J. (Eds.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1975: Conceptual Foundations of Psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. [43]
    Committee on Scientific and Professional Aims of Psychology . The Scientific and Professional Aims of Psychology. American Psychologist 22 (1967): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [50]
    Cronbach, L.J. The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist 12 (1957): 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [72]
    De Montpellier, G. A Propos de la Notion de Comportement en Psychologie. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 65 (1968): 45–52.Google Scholar
  20. [47]
    Dilthey, W. In H.A. Hodges (Ed.), Wilhelm Dilthey: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1944.Google Scholar
  21. [54]
    Ey, H. Consciousness. Human Context 5 (1973): 473–488.Google Scholar
  22. [55]
    Ey, H. Consciousness: A Phenomenological Study of Being Conscious and Becoming Conscious. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978 (Translated from 1968 edition by J.H. Flodstrom).Google Scholar
  23. [49]
    Fearon, A.D. The Two Sciences of Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1937.Google Scholar
  24. [48]
    Fernberger, S. Behaviorism Versus Introspective Psychology. In C.E. Skinner (Ed.), Readings in Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1935.Google Scholar
  25. [10]
    Filella, J. Toward a Psychological Psychology. Thought 43 (1968): 71–86.Google Scholar
  26. [14]
    Fine, R. On the Nature of Scientific Method in Psychology. Psychological Reports 24 (1969): 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [21]
    Gadlin, H., and Ingle, G. Through the One-Way Mirror: The limits of Experimental Self-Reflection. American Psychologist 30 (1975): 1003–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [35]
    Gauld, A., and Shotter, J. Human Action and Its Psychological Investigation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. [6]
    Giorgi, A. Psychology as a Human Science. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. [17]
    Graumann, C.F. The State of Psychology land II. Internationaljournal of Psychology 7 (1972): 123–134 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [17a]
    Graumann, C.F. The State of Psychology land II. Internationaljournal of Psychology 7 (1972): 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [19]
    Guntrip, H. Science, Psychodynamic Reality and Autistic Thinking. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis 1 (1973); 3–22.Google Scholar
  33. [69]
    Hartnack, J. The Concept of Act and Behavior. Man and World 1 (1968): 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [40]
    Hebb, D.C. What Psychology is About. American Psychologist 29 (1974): 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [13]
    Hitt, W.D. Two Models of Man. American Psychologist 24 (1969): 651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [28]
    Hudson, L. The Cult of the Fact. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
  37. [75]
    James, W. The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt and Co., 1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [9]
    Kagan, J. On the Need for Relativism. American Psychologist 22 (1967): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [3]
    Kantor, J. Cognition as Events and as Psychic Constructions. The Psychological Record 28 (1978): 329–342.Google Scholar
  40. [31]
    Ringet, G.M. On Being Human: A Systematic View. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. [65]
    Kitchener, R.F. Behavior and Behaviorism. Behaviorism 5 (1977): 11–71.Google Scholar
  42. [5]
    Koch, S. Language Communities, Search Cells and the Psychological Studies. In J.F. Cole and W.J. Arnold [33].Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1975: Conceptual Foundations of Psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1976Google Scholar
  43. [44]
    Koch, S. Epilogue: Some Trends of Study I. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  44. [39]
    Kruglanski, A.W. On the Paradigmatic Objections to Experimental Psychology: A Reply to Gadlin and Ingle. American Psychologist 31 (1976): 655–663.Google Scholar
  45. [63]
    Landgrebe, L. The Phenomenological Concept of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34(1973): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [61]
    Landsman, T. Psychology as the Science of Behavior and Experience. In D. Nevill (Ed.), Humanistic Psychology: New Frontiers. New York: Gardner Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  47. [74]
    Lewes, G.H. The Study of Psychology: Its Object, Scope and Method. London: Trubner and Co., 1879.Google Scholar
  48. [12]
    Lichtenstein, P. Psychological Systems: Their Nature and Function. The Psychological Record 17 (1967): 321–340.Google Scholar
  49. [1]
    Mace, C.A., and Peters, R.S. Psychology and Philosophy. In R. Klibansky, (Ed.), Philosophy in the Mid-Century, Vol. 2. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1958.Google Scholar
  50. [71]
    Macklin, R. Explanation and Action: Recent Issues and Controversies. Synthese 20 (1967): 388–415.Google Scholar
  51. [15]
    Maslow, A. A Psychology of the Future. The Humanist 29 (1969): 8.Google Scholar
  52. [73]
    Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Behavior. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  53. [68]
    Moore, H.F. Explanation and Understanding: Recent Models for Interpreting Action. International Philsophical Quarterly 13 (1973): 419–434.Google Scholar
  54. [36]
    Mucciolo, L.F. Fodor on the Unity of Science. The Philosophical Forum 3 New Series (1971): 133–137.Google Scholar
  55. [56]
    Neisser, U. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  56. [38]
    Observer, Comments and Queries. The Science of Psychology 1976. What Progress? The Psychological Record 26 (1976): 289–296.Google Scholar
  57. [53]
    Ornstein, R.E. (Ed.) The Nature of Human Consciousness. San Francisco, Freeman and Co., 1973.Google Scholar
  58. [52]
    Ornstein, R.E. (Ed.) The Psychology of Consciousness. San Francisco, Freeman and Co., 1972.Google Scholar
  59. [2]
    Otero, M.H. Philosophical Problems of Scientific Psychology. In R. Klibansky (Ed.), Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 3. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1969.Google Scholar
  60. [51]
    Pilkington, G.W., and Glasgow, W.D. Towards a Rehabilitation of Introspection as a Method in Psychology. Journal of Existentialism 7 (1967): 329–350.Google Scholar
  61. [23]
    Proshansky, H.M. Environmental Psychology and the Real World. American Psychologist 31 (1976): 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [45]
    Radnitzky, G. Contemporary Schools of Metascience. Göteborg: Scandinavian University Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  63. [60]
    Richardson, A. The Place of Subjective Experience in Contemporary Psychology. British Journal of Psychology 56 (1965): 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [32]
    Robinson, D.N. An Intellectual History of Psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  65. [29]
    Roche, M. Phenomenology, Languages and Social Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.Google Scholar
  66. [42]
    Royce, J. (Ed.) Toward Unification in Psychology. The First Banff Conference on Theoretical Psychology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  67. [62]
    Sardello, R. The Role of Direct Experience in Contemporary Psychology. In A. Giorgi, W. Fischer and R. von Eckartsburg (Eds.), Duquesne Studies in Phenomenological Psychology, I. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  68. [34]
    Shotter, J. Images of Man in Psychological Research. London: Methuen, 1975.Google Scholar
  69. [4]
    Skinner, B.F. About Behaviorism. New York: Knopf, 1976.Google Scholar
  70. [58]
    Sperry, R.W. A Modified Concept of Consciousness. Psychological Review 16 (1969): 532–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. [67]
    Stephens, K.D. Aspects of the Logic of Action. New Scholasticism 49 (1975): 310–320.Google Scholar
  72. [64]
    Suppes, P. From Behaviorism to Neobehaviorism. Theory and Decision 6 (1975): 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. [26]
    van Kaam, A. Existential Foundations of Psychology. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  74. [18]
    Viteles, M.S. Psychology Today: Fact and Fable. American Psychologist 27 (1972): 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [8]
    Watson, R.I. Psychology: A Prescriptive Science. American Psychologist 22(1967): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. [70]
    Yolton, J. Action: Metaphysic and Modality. American Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1973): 71–85.Google Scholar
  77. [66]
    Zuriff, G.E. Where is the Agent in Behavior? Behaviorism 3 (1975): 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amedeo Giorgi
    • 1
  1. 1.Duquesne UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations