Advertisement

Theoretical Study of a Homogeneous Catalytic Reaction: The Chlorotris-(Triphenylphosphine)Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Olefins

  • A. Dedieu
  • A. Strich
  • A. Rossi
Part of the Quantum Theory Chemical Reactions book series (QTCR, volume 2)

Abstract

Chemical organic reactions have been the subject of numerous theoretical studies in the past few years. Much less attention has been paid however, to organometallic and catalytic reactions, due to the greater complexity of the systems to be studied and to the greater computational effort to be put in. As a consequence most theoretical investigations 1–11 devoted to catalytic reactions have been limited to semi-empirical methods 1–4, 7, 9–11.

Keywords

Potential Energy Surface Catalytic Cycle Oxidative Addition Phosphine Ligand Interaction Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Notes

  1. 1.
    Wheelock, K.S., Nelson, J.H., Kelly, J.D., Jonassen H.B., and Cusachs, L.C.: 1973, J. Chem. Soc, Dalton Trans., p. 1457.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakaki, S., Kato, H., Kanai, H., and Tamara, K.: 1974, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 47, p. 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakaki, S., Kato, H., Kanai, H., and Tamara, K.: 1975, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 48, p. 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amstrong, D.R., Fortune, R., and Perkins, P.G.: 1976, J. Catal., 42, p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grima, J.Ph., Choplin, F., and Kaufmann, G.: 1977, J. Organomet. Chem., 129, p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salem, L., Eisenstein, O., Ann, N.T., Bürgi, H.B., Devaquet, A., Segal, G., and Veillard, A.: 1977, Nouv. J. Chim., 1, p. 335.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thorn, D.L., and Hoffmann, R.: 1978, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 100, p. 2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8a).
    Giunchi, G., Clementi, E., Ruiz-Vizcaya, M.E., and Novaro, O.: 1977, Chem. Phys. Lett., 49, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8b).
    Novaro, O., Blaisten-Barojas, E., Clementi, E., Giunchi, G., and Ruiz-Vizcaya, M.E.: 1978, J. Chem. Phys., 68, p. 2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Haber, J., Sochaka-Witko, M., and Golebiewski, A.: 1977, J. Mol. Cat., 3, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    Cassoux, F., Crasnier, F., and Labarre, J.F.: 1979, J. Organomet. Chem., 165, p. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Stockis, A., and Hoffmann, R.: submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    See for instance Adv. Organomet. Chem., vol. 17.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Dedieu, A.: 1980, Inorg. Chem., 19, p. 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    Dedieu, A., and Strich, A.: 1979, Inorg. Chem., 18, p. 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    Dedieu, A., and Rossi, A.: to be published.Google Scholar
  17. 16a).
    Jardine, F.H., Osborn, J.A., Wilkinson, G., and Young, J.F.: 1965, Chem. Ind. (London), 560.Google Scholar
  18. 16b).
    Bennett, M.A., and Longstaff, P.A.: 1965, Chem. Ind. (London), 846.Google Scholar
  19. 16c).
    Osborn, J.A., Jardine, F.H., Young, J.F., and Wilkinson, G.: 1966, J. Chem. Soc. A, p. 1711.Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    For reviews on homogeneous hydrogenation of olefins see: James, B.R., Homogeneous hydrogenation”, Wiley, New York 1973.Google Scholar
  21. 17a).
    Harmon, R.E., Gupta, S.K., and Brown, D.J.: 1973, Chem. Rev. 73, p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 17b).
    Dolcetti, G., and Hoffman, N.W.: 1974, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 9, p. 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 17c).
    James, B.R.: 1979, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 17, p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 17d).
    Birch, A.J., and Williamson, D.H.: 1976, Org. React., 24, p. 1.Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    Tolman, C.A., Meakin, P.Z., Lindner, D.L., and Jesson, J.P.: 1974, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 96, p. 2762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 19.
    Halpern, J., and Wong, C.S.: 1973, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., p. 629.Google Scholar
  27. 20.
    Bond, G.C., and Hillyard, R.A.: 1968, Discuss. Faraday Soc, 46, p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 21.
    Hussey, A.S., and Takeuchi, Y.: 1969, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 91, p. 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 22.
    Ohtani, Y., Fujimoto, M., and Yamagashi, A.: 1976, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 49, p. 1871;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 22a.
    Ohtani, Y., Fujimoto, M., and Yamagashi, A.: 1977, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 50, p. 1453;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 22b.
    Ohtani, Y., Fujimoto, M., and Yamagashi, A.: 1979,Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 52, p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 23.
    Halpern, J., Okamoto, T., and Zakhariev, A.: 1976, J. Mol. Cat., 2, p. 65.Google Scholar
  33. 24.
    Siegel, S., and Ohrt, D.: 1972, Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 8, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 25a).
    Hitchcok, P.B., McPartlin, M., and Mason, R.: 1969, Chem. Commun., p. 1367.Google Scholar
  35. 25b).
    Bennett, M.J., and Donaldson, P.B.: 1977, Inorg. Chem., 16, p. 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 25c).
    There is also an EXAFS structure of RhCl (PPh3)3 in solution: Reed, J., Eisenberger, P., Teo, B.K., and Kincaid, B.M.: 1977, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 99, p. 5217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 26.
    Yared, Y.W., Miles, S.L., Bau, R., and Reed, C.A.: 1977, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, p. 7076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 27.
    Van Gaal, H.L.M., and Van den Bekerom, F.L.A.: 1977, J. Organomet. Chem., 134, p. 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 28.
    Meakin, P., Jesson, J.P., and Tolman, C.A.: 1972, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 94, p. 3240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 29.
    Masters, C., and Shaw, B.L.: 1971, J. Chem. Soc A, p. 3679.Google Scholar
  41. 30.
    Van Gaal, H.L.M., Verlaak, J.M., and Posno, T.: 1977, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 23, p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 31.
    Crabtree, R.H., Felkin, H., and Morris, G.E.: 1976, J. Chem. Soc Chem. Commun., p. 716.Google Scholar
  43. 32.
    Crabtree, R.H., Felkin, H., Fillebeen-Khan, and Morris, G.E.: 1979, J. Organomet. Chem., 168, p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 33.
    Hietkamp, S., Stufkens, D.J., and Vrieze, K.: 1978, J. Organomet. Chem., 152, p. 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 34.
    Werner, H., Feser, R.: 1979, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed Engl., 18, p. 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 35.
    Chaudret, B.N., Cole-Hamilton, D.J., and Wilkinson, G.: 1978, Acta Chem. Scand., A32, p. 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 36.
    This hydrogenation reaction involves the cationic rhodium catalyst [Rh(diphos)] + (diphos = 1, 2 bis(diphenylphosphinoethane)).Google Scholar
  48. 37.
    Chan, A.S.C., and Halpern, J.: 1980, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 102, p. 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 38.
    Bénard, M., Dedieu, A., Demuynck, J., Rohmer, M.M., Strich, A., and Veillard, A., “Asterix: a system of programs for the Univac 1110”, unpublished work, Bénard, M.: 1976, J. Chim. Phys., 73, p. 413.Google Scholar
  50. 39.
    Demuynck, J., and Dedieu, A., unpublished results.Google Scholar
  51. 40.
    Roos, B., and Siegbahn, P.: 1970, Theor. Chim. Acta, 17, p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 41.
    Whitman, D.R., and Hornback, C.H.: 1969, J. Chem. Phys., 51, p. 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 42.
    Huzinaga, S.: 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 42, p. 1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 43.
    Hoffmann, R.: private communication.Google Scholar
  55. 44.
    Tolman, C.A.: 1977, Chem. Rev., 77, p. 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 45.
    Rossi, A., and Hoffmann, R.: 1975, Inorg. Chem., 14, p. 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 46a).
    Kagan, H.B., and Dang, T.P.: 1972, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 94, p. 6429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 46b).
    Dang, T.P., Poulin, J.C., and Kagan, H.B.: 1975, J. Organomet. Chem., 91, p. 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 46c).
    Brunie, S., Mazan, J., Langlois, N., and Kagan, H.B.: 1976, J. Organomet. Chem., 114, p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 47.
    Knowles, W.S., Sabacky, M.J., and Vineyard, B.D.: 1972, Chem. Commun., p. 10.Google Scholar
  61. 48.
    Horner, L., Siegel, H., and Buthe, H.: 1968, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 7, p. 942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 49.
    Morrison, J.D., Burnett, R.E., Aguiar, A.M., Morrow, C.J., and Philipps, C.J.: 1971, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 93, p. 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 50.
    De Croon, M.H.J.M., Van Nisselroij, P.F.M.T., Kuipers, H.J.A.M., and Coenen, J.W.E.: 1978, J. Mol. Cat., 4, p. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 51a).
    Collmann, J.P.: 1968, AcC. Chem. Res., 1, p. 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 51b).
    Vaska, L.: 1968, Acc. Chem. Res., 1, p. 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 51c).
    Halpern, J.: 1970, Acc. Chem. Res., 3, p. 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 51d).
    Pearson, R.G.: 1976, “Symmetry Rules for Chemical Reactions”, Wiley, New York, pp. 292–294.Google Scholar
  68. 52.
    In this scheme and in the following the calculated relative energies of the hydridoalkyl stereoisomers correspond to the eclipsed geometry of the alkyl ligand. The C-C bond eclipses the Rh-H bond in 6a and 6b and staggers the Rh-Cl bond in 6c.Google Scholar
  69. 53.
    Herzberg, G.: 1950, “Spectra of Diatomic Molecules”, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  70. 54.
    Braterman, P.S., and Cross, R.J.: 1973, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2, p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 55.
    Halpern, J.: 1959, Adv. in Catal., 11, p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 56.
    Nyholm, R.S.: 1964, Proc. Int. Congr. Catal., 3rd, 25.Google Scholar
  73. 57.
    Devaquet, A., Sevin, A., and Bigot, B.: 1978, J. Am, Chem. Soc, 100, p. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 58.
    The reaction path determined from the extended Hückel potential energy surface yields H-H distances which are probably too short.Google Scholar
  75. 59.
    Hyla-Kryspin, I., and Dedieu, A.: to be published. 60. Halpern, J., Riley, D.P., Chan, A.S.C., and Pluth, J.J.: 1977, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 99, p. 8055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Dedieu
    • 1
  • A. Strich
    • 1
  • A. Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique E.R. n° 139 du C.N.R.S.Université Louis PasteurStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations