Skip to main content

Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 54))

Abstract

It is unusual for an author, less than one-tenth of the way through his work, to disclaim the existence of the subject matter that the title of his treatise announces. Yet that is exactly what Karl Popper does in his classic, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, [4], announcing in no uncertain terms on p. 31 that scientific discovery has no logic. The disclaimer is so remarkable that it deserves to be quoted at length:

I said above that the work of the scientist consists in putting forward and testing theories.

[Philosophy of Science 40, 471–480 (1973)].

This research has been supported by a Public Health Service Grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, and by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which is monitored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. I am indebted to Nicholas Rescher for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchanan, B. G., Logics of Scientific Discovery, A. I. Memo 47 (Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanson, N. R., Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson, N. J., Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Popper, K. R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson and Company, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, H.A. and Kotovsky, K., ‘Human Acquisition of Concepts for Serial Patterns’, Psychological Review 70, 534–546 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon, H. A., ‘On Judging the Plausibility of Theories’, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Edited by B. Van Rootselar and J. F. Staal (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1968), (reprinted as Chapter 1.4 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simon, H. A., ‘The Theory of Problem Solving’, Information Processing 71 (1972). (reprinted as Chapter 4.3 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, H. A. and Lea, G., ‘Problem Solving and Rule Induction: a Unified View’, in Knowledge and Cognition, edited by L. W. Gregg, (New York: Halsted-Wiley, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, H.A. (1977). Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?. In: Models of Discovery. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0970-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9521-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics