Skip to main content

The Evolution of Communicative Capacities

  • Chapter
Integrating Scientific Disciplines

Part of the book series: Science and Philosophy ((SCPH,volume 2))

Abstract

Ape-language reports, regardless of the extent of language skills claimed for apes, present both a challenge and a problem for psychology as a field. The problem is that none of the ape-language studies fit neatly into the extant categories of research. They are not “animal learning” studies in that they do not look for basic principles or laws of learning nor do they not deal with a retricted type of learning such as discrimination, memory, etc. Instead, they involve all of these processes at once in a complex manner for the expressed purpose of communication (Savage-Rumbaugh, Rumbaugh, and Boysen, 1978).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baerends, G. P. (1941). Fortpflanzungsverhalten und Orientierung der Grabwespe. In I. Eibl—Eibesfeldt (Ed.), Ethology, The Biology of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1976). Linguistic behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Breland, K. & Breland, M. ( 1966 ). Animal Behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, K. H. (1976). Vertebrate learning: evolutionary divergencies. In R. B. Masterson, C. G. B. Campbell, M. E. Bitterman, & N. Hotton (Eds.), Evolution of brain and behavior in vertebrates. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind. Enlarged Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H. (1983). On attributing consciousness to animals. Nature, 303, (5912), 1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, M. R. & Salmon, D. P. (1984). Cognitive processes in cebus monkeys. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1982). Intentional systems. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl—Eibesfeldt, I. (1949). Uber das Vorkommen von Schreckstoffen bei Erdkrotenquappen. Experimentia, 5, 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl—Eibesfeldt, I. (1965). Nannopteruni harrisi (Phalacrocoracidae). Brutablosing. Encycl. cinem., E596. Publ. zu wiss. Filmen, 1 A, 303–306 Gottigen (Inst. wiss. Film ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl—Eibesfeldt, I. (1970). Ethology, the biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1970). Learning theory and mental development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.; Bever, T. G. & Garrett, F. (1974). The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw—Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouts, R. S. (1973). Acquisition and testing of gestural signs in four young chimpanzees, Science, 180, 970–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. v. (1965). Die Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. In I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt (Ed.), Ethology, the biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. & Koellign, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. T. & Gardner, R. A. (1971). Two-way communication with an infant chimpanzee. In A. M. Schrier & F. Stollnitz (Eds.), Behavior of nonhuman primates. (Vol. 1 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York: The Rockefeller Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. (1943). The principles of behavior. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1973). The role of visible behaviour in the organization of social interaction. In M. von Cranach & I. Vine (Eds.), Social communication and movement: Studies of interaction and expression in man and chimpanzees. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. B. (1969). Primate communication systems and the emergence of human language. In P. C. Jay (Ed.), Primates: Studies in adaptation and variability. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. Z. (1971). Studies in animal and human behaviour. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. Z. (1981). The foundations of ethology. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marier, P. & Vandenberg, J. G. (1979). Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. New York and London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1971). Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otton, D. S.; Collinson, C.; and Werz, M. A. (1977). Spatial memory and radical arms maze performance of rats. Learning and memory, Vol. 8, 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. and Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The behavioral and brain sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M. (1965). Maternal care in relation to infant behavior in the squirrel monkey. Psychological reports, 16, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M. and Pate, J. L. (1984). The evolution of cognition in primates: A comparative perspective. In H. L. Roitbalt, T. G. Bever, and H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S.; Rumbaugh, D. M.; and Boysen, S. (1978a). Symbolic communication between two chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ), Science, 201, 641–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S.; Rumbaugh, D. M.; and Boysen, S. (1978b). Linguistically mediated tool use and exchange by chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ), The behavioral and brain sciences, 4, 539–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S.; Pate, J. L.; Lawson, J.; Smith, S. T.; and Rosenbaum, S. (1983). Can a chimpanzee make a statement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 457–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1984a). Verbal behavior at the procedural level in the chimpanzee. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1984b). Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes: Contrast in preverbal communicative competence. In R. L. Susman (Ed.), The pygmy chimpanzee. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S.; Sevick, R. A.; Rumbaugh, D. M.; and Rubert, E. (1985). The capacity for animals to acquire language: Do species differences have anything to say to us? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 308, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S.; Rumbaugh, D. M.; Ruben, E.; McDonald, K.; and Murphy, J. (in press).Spontaneous language acquisition by a pygmy chimpanzee. (Pan paniscus), Behavioral Neuroscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (in press). Ape languages: From conditioned responses to symbols. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M.; Cheney, D. L.; and Marier, P. (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210, 801–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. J. (1977). The behavior of communicating. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, S. (1983). Why talk? Comment on Savage-Rumbaugh et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace, H. L. (in press). In the beginning was the “name.” American Scientist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace, H. S. (1979). Nim. London: Eyre Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiker—Sebeok, J. and Sebeok, T. A. (1980). Questioning apes. In T. A. Sebeok and J. Umiker—Sebeok (Eds.), Speaking of apes. New York and London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology, the new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

William Bechtel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Hopkins, W.D. (1986). The Evolution of Communicative Capacities. In: Bechtel, W. (eds) Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Science and Philosophy, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3342-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9435-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics