Skip to main content

Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-Person Bargaining Games

  • Chapter
Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 12))

Abstract

Recent papers by Simon (1957), by March (1955, 1957), and by Dahl (1957) have suggested measuring person A’s power over person B in terms of its actual or potential effects, that is, in terms of the changes that A causes or can cause in Bs behavior.1 As Dahl puts it, A has power over B to the extent to which ‘he can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do’ (1957, p. 203).

Behavioral Science, 7 (1962), 67–80.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cartwright, D.: ‘A Field Theoretical Conception of Power’, D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Harbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1959, pp. 183–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A.: ‘The Concept of Power’, Behav. Sci., 1957, 2, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr.: ‘A Formal Theory of Social Power’, Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B.: ‘The Bases of Social Power’, in D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1959, pp. 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, J. Polit. Econ., 1955, 63, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: ‘Approaches to the Bargaining Problem Before and After the Theory of Games: a Critical Discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’, and Nash’s Theories’, Econometrica, 1956, 24, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘A Bargaining Model for the Cooperative n-Person Game’, in A. W. Tucker and R. D. Luce (Eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games, IV. Princeton; Princeton Univ. Press, 1959, pp. 325–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘A Simplified Bargaining Model for the n-Person Cooperative Game’, Intern. Econ. Rev., 1963, 4, 194–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘On the Rationality Postulates Underlying the Theory of Cooperative Games’, J. Conflict Resol., 1961, 5, 179 196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions, New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G.: ‘An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence’, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 1955,49,431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G.: ‘Measurement Concepts in the Theory of Influence’, J. Politics, 1957, 19, 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J.: ‘Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica, 1950, 18, 111–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J.: ‘Three Lectures on Probability in the Social Sciences’, in P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences, Glencoe: The Free Press, 1954, pp. 166–215. Reprinted as Cowles Commission Paper, N.S., No. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F., Jr.: ‘The Bargaining Problem’, Econometrica, 1950, 18, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F., Jr.: ‘Two-person Cooperative Games’, Econometrica, 1953, 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.: ‘An essay on Bargaining’, Amer. Econ. Rev., 1956, 46, 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M.: ‘A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System’, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 1954, 48, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: Models of Man: Social and Rational, New York: Wiley, 1957, pp. 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuthen, F.: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare, London: G. Routledge and Sons, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harsanyi, J.C. (1980). Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-Person Bargaining Games. In: Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Theory and Decision Library, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9327-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics