Skip to main content

Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 12))

Abstract

It will be argued that economic theory, decision theory and some recent work in game theory, make important contributions to a deeper understanding of the concept of rational behavior. The paper starts with a discussion of the common-sense notion of rational behavior. Then, the rationality concepts of classical economics and of Bayesian decision theory are described. Finally, some (mostly fairly recent) advances in game theory are briefly discussed, such as probabilistic models for games with incomplete information; the role of equilibrium points in non-cooperative games, and the standard game-theoretical approach to the prisoner’s dilemma problem; the concept of perfect equilibrium points; the use of non-cooperative bargaining models in analyzing cooperative games; and the Harsanyi-Selten solution concept for non-cooperative games.

From Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, (ed. by R. Butts and J. Hintikka), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, to be published.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anscombe, F. J. and Aumann, R. J. 1963, ‘A Definition of Subjective Probability’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: 1959, Theory of Value, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1953, ‘Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking’ Journal of Political Economy 61, 434–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1955, ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy 63, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1958, ‘Ethics in Terms of Hypothetical Imperatives’, Mind 47, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1967–68, ‘Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players’, Management Science 14, 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1967–68, ‘Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players’, Management Science 14, 320–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1967–68, ‘Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players’, Management Science 14, 486–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1969, ‘Rational-Choice Models of Political Behavior vs. Functionalist and Conformist Theories’, World Politics 21, 513–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1975, The Tracing Procedure: A Bayesian Approach to Defining a Solution for n-Person Non-cooperative Games’, International Journal of Game Theory 4, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1975a, ‘Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory’, American Political Science Review 59, 594–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C: 1975b, ‘Nonlinear Social Welfare Functions’, Theory and Decision 7, 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1950, ‘Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 36, 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1951, ‘Non-cooperative Games’, Annals of Mathematics 54, 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. and Marschak, J.: 1954, ‘Note on Some Proposed Decision Criteria’, in R. M. Thrall et al. Decision Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1954, pp. 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1965, ‘Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121, 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1965, ‘Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121, 667–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1975, ‘Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games’. International Journal of Game Theory 4, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1960, The New Science of Management Decision, Harper & Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harsanyi, J.C. (1980). Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior. In: Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Theory and Decision Library, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9327-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics