Advertisement

A Bargaining Model for Social Status in Informal Groups and Formal Organizations

  • John C. Harsanyi
Part of the Theory and Decision Library book series (TDLU, volume 12)

Abstract

Apart from economic payoffs, social status (social rank) seems to be the most important incentive and motivating force of social behavior. This concern for social status is perhaps more conspicuous in those societies, like the American, where the ruling ideology encourages a striving for upward social mobility, for movement to higher social status positions. But it seems to be no less important in those societies, like the traditional Indian caste society, which prevent or strongly discourage upward mobility—for at least downward mobility is possible in every society as punishment for nonfulfillment or certain social obligations. Thus the only difference is that in such less mobile societies, people’s concern for social status will take the form of simply trying to maintain their existing status and caste positions and of avoiding all types of nonconformist behavior possibly endangering these positions.

Keywords

Social Status Social Group Deferential Behavior Bargaining Model High Social Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blau, P. M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, R. A.: ‘The Concept of Power’, Behav. Sci., 1957, 2, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, K., & Wilbert E. Moore: ‘Some Principles of Stratification’, Amér. Soci. Rev., 1945, 10, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-Person Bargaining Games’, Behav. Sci., 1962a 7, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harsanyi, J. C.: ‘Measurement of Social Power in n-Person Reciprocal Power Situations’, Behav. Sci., 1962b, 7, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Homans, G. C.: ‘Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms’, New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. Maine, Sir H. J. S.: Ancient Law, London: J. Murray, 1901.Google Scholar
  8. Wynne-Edwards, V. C.: Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1962.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Harsanyi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations