Skip to main content

Experimental Tests of a Stochastic Decision Theory (1959)

  • Chapter
Economic Information, Decision, and Prediction

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 7-1))

Abstract

Common experience suggests, and experiment confirms, that a person does not always make the same choice when faced with the same options, even when the circumstances of choice seem in all relevant respects to be the same. However, the bulk of economic theory neglects the existence of such inconsistencies; and the best known theories for decision making, for example, those of von Neumann and Morgenstern [1] or Savage [2], base the existence of a measurable utility upon a pattern of invariant two-place relations, sometimes called ‘preference’ and ‘indifference’. This raises a difficulty for any attempt to use such theories to describe and predict actual behavior.

Notes

Research undertaken by the Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University, under contract Nonr-225(17), NR 171-034, with the Office of Naval Research, and by the Cowles Commission for Research in Economics under contract Nonr-358 (01), NR 047-006, with the Office of Naval Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Savage, L. J., Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1951. Revised, Dover, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mosteller, F. and Nogee, P., ‘An Experimental Measurement of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy 59 (1951) 371–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, Ward, ‘Articles on Probability Preferences’, American Journal of Psychology 66 (1953) 345–364; 67 (1954) 56–67; 67 (1954) 68–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papandreou, Andreas G., with the collaboration of O. H. Sauerlander, Brownlee, O. H., Hurwicz, L., and Franklyn, W., ‘A Test of a Stochastic Theory of Choice’, University of California Publications in Economics 16, No. 1 (1957) 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fechner, Gustav Theodor, Elemente der Psychophysik, Leipzig, 1859 and 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marschak, Jacob, ‘Norms and Habits of Decision Making Under Certainty’, Selected Essays, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luce, R. Duncan, ‘A Probabilistic Theory of Utility’, Econometrica 26 (1958) 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luce, R. Duncan and Raiffa, Howard, Games and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1957 (Appendix I, ‘A Probabilistic Theory of Utility’, pp. 371–384).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guilford, J. P., Psychometric Methods, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson, Donald, Suppes, Patrick, and Siegel, Sidney, Decision Making, An Experimental Approach, Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suppes, P. and Winet, M., ‘An Axiomatization of Utility Based on the Notion of Utility Differences’, Management Science I (1955) 259–270,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alt, Franz, ‘Ueber die Messbarkeit des Nutzens’, Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie 7, No. 2 (1936) 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suppes, P., ‘A Set of Axioms for Paired Comparisons’ (dittoed), Center for Behavioral Sciences, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Debreu, Gerard, ‘Stochastic Choice and Cardinal Utility’, Econometrica 26 [1958] 440–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott, Dana and Suppes, P., ‘Foundational Aspects of Theories of Measurement’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vail, Stephan, ‘A Stochastic Model for Utilities’, Seminar on the Application of Mathematics to the Social Sciences, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 1953 (dittoed).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsey, Frank P., The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Debreu, Gerard, ‘Cardinal Utility for Even-Chance Mixtures of Sure Prospects’, Review of Economic Studies 26 (1958–1959).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Block, H. D. and Marschak, Jacob, ‘Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses’, Selected Essays, 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, D. (1974). Experimental Tests of a Stochastic Decision Theory (1959). In: Economic Information, Decision, and Prediction. Theory and Decision Library, vol 7-1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9276-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9276-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1195-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9276-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics