Abstract
Physics has a warp and a woof, like a fabric stretched across many levels of abstraction and woven out two millenia long. Across the fabric is a pattern persistent over the entire length in which the levels tend to group themselves into three levels of increasing abstraction: theories of matter and mechanics, theories of space and geometry, and theories of logic. Running along the woof is a second pattern, a sequence of discovery pursued first at the most concrete level and then retraced at deeper levels. In this evolutionary process, the theory first passes from its earliest, most ‘rigid’, form into a different but still rigid form (fracture), and then into a non-rigid or ‘flexible’ theory with a continuum of freedom (flow). This process of fracture and flow of physical theories has attacked the deepest levels, those concerned with the logic of the physical world, only in this century and has yet to run its course there. Its working out at these levels is a principal motif of the present and of the immediate future of physics.
Young Men’s Philanthropic League Professor of Physics. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation.
Based on a transcript of a talk given before the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science on January 10, 1966.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
This time-like rather than space-like tendency of the modern world geometry has been well noted by M. Capek, Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics, Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, N.J., 1961, especially Chapter 11.
W. K. Clifford, On the Space Theory of Matter, paper presented before the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1870. Collected in James R. Newman, The World of Mathematics, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1956.
The mathematical development used extensively here is that of G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Ann. Math. 37 (1936) 823.
G. W. Mackey, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York, 1963, regards the existence of A ∪ B and A ∩ B as an unnatural assumption of present-day quantum theory, and the postulate most likely to be abandoned next.
This representation theorem assumes the system has more than two states, in the sense that 1 > 2. If 1 = 2, there are discrete special cases such as the algebra of sets of Figure 3ii, corresponding to ‘finite projective geometries’, in addition to the familiar algebras of sets represented in two-dimensional Hilbert space.
Following J. M. Jauch.
M. Tavel, Quaternion Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished), Yeshiva University (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1969 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finkelstein, D. (1969). Matter, Space and Logic. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3381-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3381-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3383-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3381-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive