Abstract
In European philosophy there have been two definite but seperate traditions. One was the tradition of the ontology of idealism, as for instance with Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz; and another was the tradition of the epistemology of empiricism, as with Locke, Berkeley and Hume. Both ontology and epistemology are speculative fields, however, and there is no justification for such narrow and exclusive associations. Idealism is not peculiar to ontology nor empiricism to epistemology. There could be for instance an epistemology of idealism and a metaphysics of empiricism. As a matter a fact epistemology has sometimes been studied in relation to idealism, as the tradition of Schelling, Fichte and Hegel exemplifies; but nobody has thought to construct a system of ontology consistent with empiricism. Yet it must remain true that eventually an ontology is known by the method it uses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feibleman, J.K. (1970). A Synthetic Method for the Study of Empirical Ontology. In: Feibleman, J.K. (eds) The New Materialism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3165-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3165-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0047-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3165-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive