Advertisement

The Significance and the Limitations of Auditory Models. Bergson and Strawson

  • Milič Čapek
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 7)

Abstract

The claim that microphysical events are ‘proto-mental entities’ may well cause alarm. Nothing sounds more suspicious and irrational than the phrase ‘introspective models in physics’. The fear of being charged with relapsing into primitive animism or pre-Socratic hylozoism prevents many serious thinkers from considering such an approach at all. The previous trend in physics, which for the last three and one-half centuries tended progressively to eliminate allsubjective elements from our scheme of the physical world, seemingly excludes any usefulness of the introspective models in physics or in the philosophy of physics.

Keywords

Physical World Modern Physic Auditory Quality Auditory Experience Auditory Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    John Dewey, The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought, Holt, New York, 1910, p. 226f.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    P. F. Strawson, Individuals, An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics(Anchor Books, 1959 ), p. 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 24.
    E. Mach, Space and Geometry(Open Court, Lasalle, 111., 1960 ), Chapter I ‘On Physiological, as Distinguished from Geometrical, Space’.Google Scholar
  4. 26.
    John Stuart Mill, Examination of Sir Willam Hamilton’s Philosophy, London, 1867, Chapter 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 29.
    Griffin, D. R., Listening in the Dark, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1958Google Scholar
  6. More about Bat “Radar”, Scientific American 199(July 1958) 40–44Google Scholar
  7. 30.
    Vitus B. Dröscher, The Mysterious Senses of Animals, E. P. Dutton & Co., New York, 1965, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  8. 31.
    Théodule Ribot, La logique des sentiments, 5th Ed., Paris, 1905, p. 151: “lamusique ne peut se developper que dans le temps: mais par l’harmonie et la polyphonie, elle a réalisé une simultanéité des successions qui lui donne un plus large champ et qui est comme un succedané de l’espace.”Google Scholar
  9. 34.
    R. Blanché, ‘Psychologie de la durée et physique du champ’. Journal de psychologie 44(1951) 411–424.Google Scholar
  10. 35.
    D.Bohm Bohm’s inaugural lecture at Birkbeck College ‘Problems in the Basic Concepts of Physics’ (1963), in particular pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    L. de Broglie, Continu et discontinu en physique moderne, Paris, 1949, p. 129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milič Čapek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations