Advertisement

The Theory of the Body-Qua-Mine as Mystery

  • Richard M. Zaner
Chapter
  • 96 Downloads
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 17)

Abstract

The quest for an “existential indubitable,” we have seen, locates one, to be sure, but it is an indubitable of a very strange type: while the explosive “j’existe!” (or: “je suis manifeste,” “es erlebt in mir”) bursts forth with unmistakable energy, it yet presents itself as fundamentally opaque. Being me myself as embodied by this body which is mine, I am unable to put it over against me; reflectively observing it, on the other hand, I only make thematic that very unity itself, with its intrinsic opacity. What does it mean for this physical organism to be mine? Do I “have” it like a triangle “has” three angles? Or is there some other sense to the “mine” here? Am I my body? Or, is it rather the case that “I” and “my body” are, not self-identical, but in some way “unified?” If they are not the same, but are unified, what kind of unity is it that combines this physical “stuff” with what is absolutely opposite to “stuff,” namely, “me,” or “mind?”

Keywords

Internal Perception Instrumental Relation Deep Community Telegraph Pole Animate Organism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Husserl, Cartesian Meditations, translated by D. Cairns, Martinus Nijhoff (The Hague, 1960), p. 97.Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    S. Kierkegaard, The Sickness Unto Death, op. cit., p. 151. Cf. EA, p. 150, where Marcel agrees wholeheartedly with Kierkegaard’s analysis of despair.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    As William James had expressed it: “What possesses the possessor possesses the possessed.” Principles of Psychology, Volume I, Henry Holt and Co. (New York, 1890), p. 340.Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    “Phenomenology and Metaphysics,” in: The Return to Reason, edited by John Wild, Henry Regnery Co. (New York, 1953), pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
  5. 1.
    Prini, op. cit., p. 42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Zaner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations