Skip to main content

Abstract

One could argue for a long time as to whether Watts was more of a late Metaphysical than an early preromantic poet. But to conclude, as in all reason one would have to, that he was a bit of both, raises more questions than it solves. What is the connection between Metaphysical and Romantic ? Does Watts in some special way reveal the missing link in a long-term evolutionary process? Does Watts, in his aesthetic theory and poetic practice, illustrate a transitional moment between the old and the new, in the same way as the body of his thought marks the end of the Renaissance and the beginning of the modern consciousness? If it is Watts’s classicism which constitutes this transitional moment, how is this part and parcel of a body of poetry at once Metaphysical and Romantic?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See John Dryden, Works, Vol. 1., ed. E. N. Hooker and H. T. Swedenberg ( Berkeley: University of California, 1956 ), p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pinto. Essays and Studies, XX (1935), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred Edward Housman, The Name and Nature of Poetry ( Cambridge: University Press, 1935 ), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto, Essays and Studies, XX (1935), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Reuben A. Brewer, “Lady Winchilsea and the Poetic Tradition of the 17th Century,” Studies in Philology, XLII (1945), 61–80. Brewer concludes that Lady Winchilsea is neither a Metaphysical nor a preromantic.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pinto, Essays and Studies, XX (1935), 92–93. Cf. T. E. Hulme’s belief that Romanticism is spilt religion.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See A. T. Quiller-Couch (ed.), The Oxford Book of English Verse ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900 ), p. 772.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoyles, J. (1971). Aesthetics. In: The Waning of the Renaissance 1640–1740. International Archives of the History of Ideas/ Archives internationales d’histoire des ideés, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3008-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3008-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3010-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3008-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics