Abstract
The reconstruction of the metaphysics operative in Aquinas’ Commentary is naturally dependent upon the successful completion of a search for the statements on method contained in that work. Some of Aquinas’ thoughts on method or procedure will be explicit, but more will be implied by the expositions of individual topics. It is with such statements, both explicit and implicit, that we are interested in the present chapter. From them, we must attempt to reconstruct the metaphysics which guided Aquinas in the composition of the Commentary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. P. Phelan, “Verum Sequitur Esse Rerum”, Mediaeval Studies, I, 1939, pp. 11–22.
S. Breton, “La deduction thomiste des categories”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, LX, 1962, pp. 5–32.
P. Hoenen, S. J., La théorie du jugement d’après St. Thomas d’Aquin, edition altera, Analecta Gregoriana, Vol. XXXIX, Series Fac. Phil, section A (n. 3), Rome, 1953, pp. 69–70.
B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, VII, 1946, pp. 349–92
B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, VIII, 1947, PP. 35–79 and 404–44
B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, X, 1949, pp. 3–40 and 359–93.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O. P., “Notre premier jugement d’existence selon saint Thomas d’Aquin”, Studia Mediaevalia in honorem admodum Rev. Patris R. J. Martin, 0. P., De Tempel Brugis, 1948, pp. 289–302.
G. Van Riet, “La notion centrale du réalisme thomiste: l’abstraction,” Problémes d’ épistémologie, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1960, pp. 11–12; 14–16; 19–21; 34.
L. B. Geiger, O. P., “De l’unité de l’être,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, XXXIII, 1949, pp. 3–14.
L. De Raeymaeker, “L’idée inspiratrice de la métaphysique thomiste,” Aquinas, III, 1960, pp. 61–82.
A. Maurer, C. S. B., “The De Quidditatibus Entium of Dietrich of Freiberg and its Criticism of Thomistic Metaphysics,” Mediaeval Studies, XVIII, 1956, pp. 173–74.
C. Hart, Thomistic Metaphysics. An Inquiry into the Act of Existing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1959, p. 122.
C. Fabro, Participation et causalité selon S. Thomas d’Aquin, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1961, pp. 63–73.
G. Isaye, S. J., La théorie de a mesure et l’existence d’un maximum selon Saint Thomas, Archives de Philosophie, XVI, Cahier I, Beauchesne, Paris, 1940, pp. 115–25; 131; 78–83.
J. Owens, C. Ss. R, “Review of: Metaphysics and the Existence of God, by Thomas C. O’Brien, O. P.…,” The New Scholasticism, XXXVI, 1962, p. 251.
J. Owens, C. Ss. R., “The Causal Proposition - Principle or Consclusion? ”, The Modern Schoolman, XXVII, 1955, pp. 159–71; 257–70; 323–39.
W. D. Ross, Aristotle’s Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1936, pp. 85–94.
G. Verbeke, “Démarches de la réflexion métaphysique chaez Aristote,” in A ristote et les problèmes de méthode, Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au let eptembre 1960, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1961, pp. 108–109.
G. E. M. Anscombe and P. T. Geach, Three Philosophers. (Aristotle, Aquinas, Frege), Blackwell, Oxford, 1961, pp. 11–39.
R. Mc Inerny, “Notes on being and Predication,” Laval Phiosophique et Théologique, XV, 1959, pp. 236–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doig, J.C. (1972). The Method of Metaphysics. In: Aquinas on Metaphysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2853-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2853-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-5045-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2853-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive