Advertisement

The Method of Metaphysics

  • James C. Doig

Abstract

The reconstruction of the metaphysics operative in Aquinas’ Commentary is naturally dependent upon the successful completion of a search for the statements on method contained in that work. Some of Aquinas’ thoughts on method or procedure will be explicit, but more will be implied by the expositions of individual topics. It is with such statements, both explicit and implicit, that we are interested in the present chapter. From them, we must attempt to reconstruct the metaphysics which guided Aquinas in the composition of the Commentary.

Keywords

Prime Mover Logical Genus Formal Object Material Thing Heavenly Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. P. Phelan, “Verum Sequitur Esse Rerum”, Mediaeval Studies, I, 1939, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  2. S. Breton, “La deduction thomiste des categories”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, LX, 1962, pp. 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Hoenen, S. J., La théorie du jugement d’après St. Thomas d’Aquin, edition altera, Analecta Gregoriana, Vol. XXXIX, Series Fac. Phil, section A (n. 3), Rome, 1953, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
  4. B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, VII, 1946, pp. 349–92Google Scholar
  5. B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, VIII, 1947, PP. 35–79 and 404–44Google Scholar
  6. B. Lonergan, S. J., “The Concept of Verbum in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas”, Theological Studies, X, 1949, pp. 3–40 and 359–93.Google Scholar
  7. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O. P., “Notre premier jugement d’existence selon saint Thomas d’Aquin”, Studia Mediaevalia in honorem admodum Rev. Patris R. J. Martin, 0. P., De Tempel Brugis, 1948, pp. 289–302.Google Scholar
  8. G. Van Riet, “La notion centrale du réalisme thomiste: l’abstraction,” Problémes d’ épistémologie, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1960, pp. 11–12; 14–16; 19–21; 34.Google Scholar
  9. L. B. Geiger, O. P., “De l’unité de l’être,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, XXXIII, 1949, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  10. L. De Raeymaeker, “L’idée inspiratrice de la métaphysique thomiste,” Aquinas, III, 1960, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
  11. A. Maurer, C. S. B., “The De Quidditatibus Entium of Dietrich of Freiberg and its Criticism of Thomistic Metaphysics,” Mediaeval Studies, XVIII, 1956, pp. 173–74.Google Scholar
  12. C. Hart, Thomistic Metaphysics. An Inquiry into the Act of Existing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1959, p. 122.Google Scholar
  13. C. Fabro, Participation et causalité selon S. Thomas d’Aquin, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1961, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
  14. G. Isaye, S. J., La théorie de a mesure et l’existence d’un maximum selon Saint Thomas, Archives de Philosophie, XVI, Cahier I, Beauchesne, Paris, 1940, pp. 115–25; 131; 78–83.Google Scholar
  15. J. Owens, C. Ss. R, “Review of: Metaphysics and the Existence of God, by Thomas C. O’Brien, O. P.…,” The New Scholasticism, XXXVI, 1962, p. 251.Google Scholar
  16. J. Owens, C. Ss. R., “The Causal Proposition - Principle or Consclusion? ”, The Modern Schoolman, XXVII, 1955, pp. 159–71; 257–70; 323–39.Google Scholar
  17. W. D. Ross, Aristotle’s Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1936, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  18. G. Verbeke, “Démarches de la réflexion métaphysique chaez Aristote,” in A ristote et les problèmes de méthode, Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au let eptembre 1960, Nauwelaerts, Louvain-Paris, 1961, pp. 108–109.Google Scholar
  19. G. E. M. Anscombe and P. T. Geach, Three Philosophers. (Aristotle, Aquinas, Frege), Blackwell, Oxford, 1961, pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
  20. R. Mc Inerny, “Notes on being and Predication,” Laval Phiosophique et Théologique, XV, 1959, pp. 236–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Doig
    • 1
  1. 1.Clayton Junior CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations