Skip to main content
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout the foregoing chapters, the data presented has pointed in the direction of a challenge to a major interpretation of the reasons behind the American decision of April 6, 1917. This interpretation, generally called “revisionist” or “disillusionist,” is the product of the investigations of numerous historians, writers, and scholars. It might be useful here to briefly summarize the basic revisionist thesis on American intervention in the First World War.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The following discussion is based largely upon the major works of the revisionist authors, especially Edwin Borchard and W. P. Lage, Neutrality for the United States (New Haven, 1940)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles A. Beard, The Devil Theory of War (New York, 1936)

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Harley Grattan, Why We Fought (New York, 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter Millis, Road to War: America, 1914–1917 (Boston, 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. G. Peterson, Propaganda for War: The Campaign Against American Neutrality, 1914–1917 (Norman, Oklahoma, 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. C. Tansill, America Goes to War (Boston, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borchard and Lage, Neutrality for the United States, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hubert Herring, And So To War (New York, 1938), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson, Propaganda for War, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson, Propaganda for War, 6; Cf. supra, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, April 18, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hebert Memorandum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The World, March 11, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carnegie Endowment, Official German Documents, I, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Press Memorandum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Keefe, K.J. (1972). Conclusion: The New York Press, 1914–1917. In: A Thousand Deadlines: The New York City Press and American Neutrality, 1914–17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2833-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2833-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2835-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2833-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics