Skip to main content
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

During the past decade, there has been considerable interest among philosophers in providing a philosophically satisfactory and helpful analysis of a particular type of human behavior called action. As I see it, this interest is a renewal of the efforts of Aristotle, in Ethica Nicomachea, to provide an analysis of voluntary action. Because of this, and because Aristotle’s distinctions regarding voluntriety are fundamentally correct, what follows is in some ways a discussion in praise of Aristotle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rayfield, D. (1972). Introduction. In: Action: An Analysis of the Concept. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2807-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2807-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1304-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2807-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics