Abstract
The literature of recent decades on the philosophy and history of science has nurtured and given wide currency to a myth concerning the present status of the dispute between the absolutistic and relativistic theories of space. In particular, that literature is rife with assertions that the post-Newtonian era has witnessed “the final elimination of the concept of absolute space from the conceptual scheme of modern physics”1 by Einstein’s general theory of relativity and that the Leibniz-Huyghens polemic against Newton and Clarke has thus been triumphantly vindicated.2 In this vein, Philipp Frank recently reached the following verdict on Einstein’s success in the implementation of Ernst Mach’s program for a relativistic account of the inertial properties of matter: “Einstein started a new analysis of Newtonian mechanics which eventually vindicated Mach’s reformulation [of Newtonian mechanics].”3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. Frank: Philosophy of Science (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1957), p. 153.
A. H. Taub: “Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions,” Annals of Mathematics, Vol. LIII (1951), p. 472.
G. Berkeley: The Principles of Human Knowledge, Paragraphs 111–17, 1710-De Motu (1726).
P. Jordan: Schwerkraft und Weltall (Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn; 1955).
J. A. Wheeler: “Mach’s Principle as a Boundary Condition for Einstein’s Field Equations and as a Central Part of the ‘Plan’ of General Relativity,” a Report given at the Conference on Relativistic Theories of Gravitation, Warsaw, Poland, July, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grünbaum, A. (1973). Has the General Theory of Relativity Repudiated Absolute Space?. In: Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2622-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2622-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0358-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2622-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive