Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Franco Burgersdijck: Late Scholasticism at Leiden

  • Chapter
Physics at Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Leiden: Philosophy and the New Science in the University

  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the prestige that the study of classical letters and history had soon acquired at the new academy, the disciplines of philosophy proper — logic, ethics and physics — initially suffered from consistent neglect.1 The chairs designated for these subjects were frequently to be found vacant, and those who did occupy them were often drawn from other fields than philosophy. Only in the early seventeenth century does a greater concern for philosophic instruction become evident in the person of the Scot, Gilbertus Jacchaeus. Having come to Leiden as a student in theology in 1603, he joined the faculty of philosophy as professor of logic in 1605 and was two years later entrusted with the chair in ethics as well.2 In 1614, however, he published his Institutiones physicae, the first work of any note on physics to issue from Leiden’s faculty, and in 1617 he was given the responsibility for physics alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. See Paul Dibon, La Philosophie néerlandaise au siècle d’or, Vol. I: L’Enseignement philosophique dans les universités à l’époque pré-cartésienne, 1575–1650 (Paris, etc.: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1954); also Ferdinand Sassen, “Het oudste wijsgeerig Onderwijs te Leiden (1575–1619),” Mededeelingen, Kon. Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, Afdeeling Letterkunde, new series, Vol. IV (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a short biography of Jacchaeus, see the Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek, ed. P. C. Molhuysen and P. J. Blok (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1911–37), Vol. I, 1197–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On Snellius, see Ibid., Vol. VII, 1155–63, and J. A. Vollgraff, “Pierre de la Ramée (1515–1572) et Willebrord Snell van Royen (1580–1626),” Janus, XVIII (1913), pp. 595–625.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For biographical data on Burgersdijck, see the Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek, Vol. VII, 229–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholas Hans, New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1951), p. 51. Kearney, Scholars and Gentlemen, p. 164. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dibon, La Philosophie néerlandaise, Vol. I, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The second edition (Lugd. Batavorum: Ex officina Bonavent. et Abrahami Elzevir, 1627) has been used in this study.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Again, the second edition (Lugd. Batavorum: Ex officinâ Elziviriorum, 1642) will be referred to below.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Neal W. Gilbert, Renaissance Concepts of Method (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 269–70 and 279–81. Gilbert, Renaissance Concepts, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Idea philosophiae naturalis, “Philosophiae studiosis.”

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Reif on the manualists’ discussion of method, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 267–81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dibon, La Philosophie néerlandaise, Vol. I, pp. 44 and 96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maurice de Wulf, Scholasticism Old and New: An Introduction to Scholastic Philosophy, Medieval and Modern (trans. P. Coffey; Dublin: M. H. Gill and Son, Ltd.; London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1910), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  15. William T. Costello, The Scholastic Curriculum at Early 17th Century Cambridge (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958), p. 94. In the years around 1600, the soul was, in fact, the most popular subject for disputations in physics at Leiden (Dibon, La Philosophie néerlandaise, Vol. I, pp. 57–8).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collegium physicum, p. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 25 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 28. Nonetheless, the Aristotelian form established the identity of a thing essentially with respect to its “species.”

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nos igitur cum Aristotele statuamus, formas ante generationem non esse nihil, sed id esse potentia, quod actu sunt post generationem. (Ibid.)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., pp. 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 14 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 105–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Collegium physicum, pp. 20–1. “Act,” actus, had a formal meaning in peripatetic philosophy; it was the perfected realization of what was previously potential.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 110–1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Collegium physicum, pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 26. Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 44–5 and 128–30.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), p. 128. @Reif, op. cit., p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), p. 119–20 @Collegium physicum, pp. 26 and 21. Reif, op. cit., see pp. 119–20.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), 126 ff @and 126 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Collegium physicum, see pp. 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), pp. 82–5 @Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” see pp. 82–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Collegium physicum, pp. 76 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), pp. 213 @Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 213

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), pp. 215@and 215.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World, trans. Andrew Motte (1729), rev. by Florian Cajori (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1946), pp. XVII and XVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Collegium physicum, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., pp. 63 and 73.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), pp. 145–6 @Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” pp. 145–6.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Collegium physicum, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., pp. 37–8 and 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., pp. 9–10. In addition to the theoretical sciences were the practical sciences, including, according to Burgersdijck, ethics, politics and economics (philosophia oeconomica). Logic, said Burgersdijck, should not be considered a part of philosophy but, rather, an instrument of philosophy. (Ibid., pp. 1–2.)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., pp. 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid., p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid., pp. 84–5.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., p. 66. See Friedrich Solmsen, Aristotle’s System of the Physical World (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1960), pp. 94 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., p. 66. See Friedrich Solmsen, Aristotle’s System of the Physical World (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1960), pp. 232–3 ff@and 232–3.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Collegium physicum, pp. 66 and 73.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ibid., pp. 39–40 and 35.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), p. 200.@Reif, “Natural Philosophy,” p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sister Mary Richard Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth Century Scholastic Textbooks” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, 1962), p. 212@Ibid., p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Collegium physicum, pp. 80–1.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid., pp. 73,40 and 82–5.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid., p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ibid., p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ibid., pp. 106 and 102–3.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid., p. 116 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid., pp. 111–3.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid., pp. 109–10 and 97 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ibid., pp. 106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ibid., p. 109 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ibid., p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ibid., p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibid., p. 351.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Edward G. Ruestow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruestow, E.G. (1973). Franco Burgersdijck: Late Scholasticism at Leiden. In: Physics at Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Leiden: Philosophy and the New Science in the University. Archives Internationales D’histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2463-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2463-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1557-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2463-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation