Skip to main content
  • 121 Accesses

Abstract

It was true to say that our considerations could not be scientific ones. It was not of any possible interest to us to find out empirically that, contrary to our preconceived ideas, it is possible to think such-and-such — whatever that may mean. (The conception of thoughts as a gaseous medium.) And we may not advance any kind of theory. There must not be anything hypothetical in our considerations. We must do away with all explanation, and description alone must take its place. And this description gets it light, that is to say its purpose — from the philosophical problems. These are, of course, not empirical problems; they are solved, rather, by looking into the workings of our language (durch eine Einsicht in das Arbeiten unserer Sprache), and that in such a way as to make us recognize those workings: in despite of an urge to misunderstand them. The problems are solved, not by giving new information, but by arranging what we have always known. Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language. (§ 109)

Tell X that speech is not dirty silence Clarified. It is silence made still dirtier.28

Wallace Stevens

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Wallace Stevens, “The Creations of Sound,” in The Collected Poems of Wallace Stevens (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1955) pp. 310–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. K. Bouwsma, “The Blue Book,” The Journal of Philosophy I,VIII (1961), pp. 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. K. Bouwsma, Philosophical Essays (Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Collingwood, The Principles of Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. Stanley Cavell, “The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy,” The Philosophical Review LXXI (1962), pp. 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binkley, T. (1973). The Remark. In: Wittgenstein’s Language. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2450-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2450-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1541-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2450-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics