Skip to main content

Abstract

The cloud, no larger than a man’s hand, which had been visible in the skies of Europe since the death of Felipe IV in 1665, had become by 1700 a lowering thunderhead which obscured the entire political horizon. Carlos II, the last, childless scion of the Spanish Habsburgs, died at Madrid on November 1 of the last year of the old century.1 The statesmen of Europe, who viewed the inevitable struggle which would follow the death of Carlos with grave misgivings, had been searching for over a generation for a peaceful means of avoiding such a struggle.2 But as had been the case so frequently, rational arrangements made by sensible men of good will were blown asunder by political irrationalities, human inconsistencies and unforeseen events beyond anyone’s control. The First Treaty of Partition, which William III and Louis XIV had devised as a way of avoiding a general war over the Spanish succession, was rendered irrelevant by the untimely but quite probably natural death of the youthful Electoral Prince of Bavaria, Joseph Ferdinand.3 A second treaty of partition, also the work of English and French diplomatists, failed to lessen the threat of war because the Emperor Leopold refused to have anything to do with it and asserted that he and his sons were the only legitimate heirs to the Spanish crown.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For the death of Carlos II: J. Nada [John Langdon Davies], Carlos the Bewitched (London: Jonathan Cape, 1963), pp. 251–257 and Postrimerías, Vol. III, pp. 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lavisse, op. cit., Vol. 8, pt. I, pp. 67–68 for the Second Treaty; Postrimerías, Vol. IV, p. 403 for the declaration by the Emperor, 8 July 1699.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 99 and p. 156; Vol. II, p. 43; see also H. Graetz, Geschichte der Juden (third ed., Leipzig: O. Lerner, 1896), Vol. X, pp. 282–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 119; Mentz, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 93–98 and Hantsch, op. cit., (1929), pp. 16 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120; Wild, op. cit., p. 106 and Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 521 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120; Lothar Gross, Die Geschichte der deutschen Reichshofkanzlei von 1559 bis 1806, (“Inventare Oesterreichischen Staatlicher Archive,” V, Vienna, 1933), 59 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gross, op. cit., (1933), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 522; Hantsch, op. cit., (1929), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christian Brodbeck, “Philip Wilhelm Reichsgraf zu Boyneburg 1656–1717,” Mitteilungen des Vereins für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Erfurts, XLIV (1927), p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hantsch, op. cit., p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hantsch, op. cit., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hantsch, op. cit., p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 122; Zeller, op. cit., Vol. III, 2, pp. 82–83; Lavisse, op. cit., Vol. 8, 1, pp. 65–72 and Rassow, op. cit., pp. 335–336.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borodajkewycz, ibid.; Bittner-Gross, op. cit., p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schlick to Vienna, 27 April 1701, H. H. St. A., R. K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lothar Franz — Ludwig Wilhelm correspondence in M.E.A., Militaria, Fasc. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 537.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., citing M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lothar Franz to Friedrich Karl, July 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bittner, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 115 and Sante, op. cit., pp. 19 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hantsch, op. cit., p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, 26 May 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Report of Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, undated, Vienna, Schönbornarchiv, Familienarchiv, Fasc. 86, No. 74

    Google Scholar 

  36. Report of Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, undated, Vienna, Schönbornarchiv, Familienarchiv, Fasc. 86, No. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lothar Franz to the Electors of Trier and the Palatinate, 26 July 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  40. John Philip Francis to Lothar Franz, 7 August 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gudenus to Lothar Franz, 21 August 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 128; report of Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold 13 August 1700, Reichskanzlei, Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 128; L. Ennen, Der Spanische Erbfolgekrieg und der Kurfürst Johann Klement (Jena: Mauke, 1851), p. 62 and p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lothar Franz to Joseph Clement and Johann Hugo, 17 November 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nada [John Langdon Davies], Carlos the Bewitched (London: Jonathan Cape, 1963), pp. 251–257. Don Carlos died on the afternoon of 1 November; news of his death was known in Paris by 9 November, but does not appear to have been known in Central Europe until around the middle of the month.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Joseph Clement to Lothar Franz, 1 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99. But of course he never withdrew it

    Google Scholar 

  51. Louis XIV notified the major German princes of his action on 21 November: M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  52. J. H. Plumb, Sir Robert Walpole (London: The Cresset Press, 1956), I, 93–96; Ogg, op. cit., pp. 459–460.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Joseph Clement to Lothar Franz, 9 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stadion to Lothar Franz, 13 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fase. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wolf, op. cit., pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. O. Redlich, Die österreichische Grossmachtbildung in der Zeit Kaiser Leopolds I (Gotha: F. A. Perthes, 1921), p. 509.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 135; B. Erdmannsdörffer, Deutsche Geschichte, Vol. II, pp. 71 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  62. R. Fester, “Franken und die Kreisverfassung,” Neujahrsblätter herausgegeben von der Gesellschaft für fränkische Geschichte, I (1906), passim

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. H. Kaufmann, “Der Gedanke fränkischen Gemeinschaftsgefühls in Politik u. Geschichte des fränkischen Reichskreises,” Archiv des historischen Vereins von Unterfranken, LXIX (September 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 136. There is an account of the Heidenheim Association in M.E.A., Kreisakten, Fasc. 21. See also Kopp, op. cit., pp. 141 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 14 September and 7 December 1700, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16. Bittner and Gross, op. cit., p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  68. H. Polster, “Der Markgraf Christian Ernst von Brandenburg-Bayreuth und seine Rolle in der Reichskriegen 1689–1701,” Erlanger Abhandlungen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte, XXIII (1935), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 10 January 1701, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Polster, op. cit., p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 10 February 1701, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 12 March 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a. Rousseau de Chamoy was properly accredited only to the Imperial Diet.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 9 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wild, op. cit., p. 107, citing Theatrum Europaeum, Vol. XVI, pp. 493–494.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 29 January and 23 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a. For the Emperor’s army at this time: Braubach, Eugen, Vol. I, pp. 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 29 January and 23 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  81. A. Gaedeke, Die Politik Oesterreich in der spanischen Erbfolgefrage (2 vols.; Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1877), Vol. II, pp. 93, 96 and 98.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 10 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 4 March 1701, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 23 March 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 6 April 1701, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  87. G. F. Preuss, “König Wilhelm III, Bayern und die Grosse Allianz, 1701,” Historische Zeitschrift, N.F. LVII (1904), 198.

    Google Scholar 

  88. André Lebon, ed., Recueil des Instructions, (Paris: F. Alcan, 1889), Vol. VII, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Preuss, op. cit., p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Heiss von Kockenheim to Lothar Franz, 5 April 1701, M.E.A., Korrespon-denz, Fasc. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 13 April 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  92. M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Schlick to Leopold, 7 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 144–145.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Schlick to Leopold, 7 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 144–145.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Postrimerías, Vol. V, p. 591, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Polster, op. cit., p. 70 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 14 June and 19 July 1701, M.E.A., Friedens-akten, Fasc. 84a; Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 25 June 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 2 May 1701; Max Emanuel had sold out to France months before and Joseph Clement had preceded him.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148. The Emperor was, indeed, a belligerent, as his forces under Prince Eugene had invaded Upper Italy in May. Cf. Braubach, Eugen, Vol. I, pp. 315 ft

    Google Scholar 

  110. For the congress of Heilbronn; reports of Löwenstein-Wertheim, 28 August and 31 August 1701, loc. cit.; Kopp, op. cit., pp. 148 ff; S. Riezler, Geschichte Bayerns (2nd ed.; Gotha: F. A. Perthes, 1927), pp. 519 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Polster, op. cit., pp. 73 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Imperial instruction to Schlick, 5 August 1701, R.K., Instruktionen, Fasc. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Report by Löwenstein-Wertheim, 24 May 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148, from instruction of 18 May 1701, R.K. Weisungen ins Reich, Fasc. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Instruction to Schlick, 14 August 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Stepney, the well-informed English envoy, believed that Schlick’s success with the southern princes broke the last links between Leopold and Max Emanuel, Preuss, op. cit., p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 149. From the dispatches of Schlick, 1, 3, and 9 October 1701 and Lothar Franz’s declaration, 20 October, R. K. Moguntina, Fasc. 12a. Cf. Wild, op. cit., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Bittner, op. cit., I, pp. 119 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schlick to Leopold, 9 October 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Schlick to Leopold, 9 October 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Wild, op. cit., p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  126. G. A. Süss, “Geschichte des oberrheinischen Kreises… 1696–1714,” Zeit-schrift für die Geschichte des Oberrheins, LXIV (1955), 2. Heft, p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, R.H. (1973). Lothar Franz von Schönborn and the Spanish Succession 1699–1701. In: Lothar Franz von Schönborn and the Diplomacy of the Electorate of Mainz. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2389-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2389-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1346-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2389-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics