Abstract
The cloud, no larger than a man’s hand, which had been visible in the skies of Europe since the death of Felipe IV in 1665, had become by 1700 a lowering thunderhead which obscured the entire political horizon. Carlos II, the last, childless scion of the Spanish Habsburgs, died at Madrid on November 1 of the last year of the old century.1 The statesmen of Europe, who viewed the inevitable struggle which would follow the death of Carlos with grave misgivings, had been searching for over a generation for a peaceful means of avoiding such a struggle.2 But as had been the case so frequently, rational arrangements made by sensible men of good will were blown asunder by political irrationalities, human inconsistencies and unforeseen events beyond anyone’s control. The First Treaty of Partition, which William III and Louis XIV had devised as a way of avoiding a general war over the Spanish succession, was rendered irrelevant by the untimely but quite probably natural death of the youthful Electoral Prince of Bavaria, Joseph Ferdinand.3 A second treaty of partition, also the work of English and French diplomatists, failed to lessen the threat of war because the Emperor Leopold refused to have anything to do with it and asserted that he and his sons were the only legitimate heirs to the Spanish crown.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
For the death of Carlos II: J. Nada [John Langdon Davies], Carlos the Bewitched (London: Jonathan Cape, 1963), pp. 251–257 and Postrimerías, Vol. III, pp. 489–490.
Lavisse, op. cit., Vol. 8, pt. I, pp. 67–68 for the Second Treaty; Postrimerías, Vol. IV, p. 403 for the declaration by the Emperor, 8 July 1699.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 117.
Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 99 and p. 156; Vol. II, p. 43; see also H. Graetz, Geschichte der Juden (third ed., Leipzig: O. Lerner, 1896), Vol. X, pp. 282–283.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 119; Mentz, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 93–98 and Hantsch, op. cit., (1929), pp. 16 ff.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 119.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120; Wild, op. cit., p. 106 and Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 521 ff.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 120; Lothar Gross, Die Geschichte der deutschen Reichshofkanzlei von 1559 bis 1806, (“Inventare Oesterreichischen Staatlicher Archive,” V, Vienna, 1933), 59 ff.
Gross, op. cit., (1933), p. 62.
Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 522; Hantsch, op. cit., (1929), p. 50.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 121–122.
Christian Brodbeck, “Philip Wilhelm Reichsgraf zu Boyneburg 1656–1717,” Mitteilungen des Vereins für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Erfurts, XLIV (1927), p. 99.
Hantsch, op. cit., p. 36.
Ibid., p. 37.
Hantsch, op. cit., p. 37.
Ibid., p. 38.
Hantsch, op. cit., p. 39.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 122; Zeller, op. cit., Vol. III, 2, pp. 82–83; Lavisse, op. cit., Vol. 8, 1, pp. 65–72 and Rassow, op. cit., pp. 335–336.
Borodajkewycz, ibid.; Bittner-Gross, op. cit., p. 223.
Schlick to Vienna, 27 April 1701, H. H. St. A., R. K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Lothar Franz — Ludwig Wilhelm correspondence in M.E.A., Militaria, Fasc. 32.
Schulte, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 537.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 123.
Ibid., citing M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Ibid.
Lothar Franz to Friedrich Karl, July 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 124.
Bittner, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 115 and Sante, op. cit., pp. 19 ff.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 125.
Hantsch, op. cit., p. 41.
Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, 26 May 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 125.
Ibid.
Report of Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, undated, Vienna, Schönbornarchiv, Familienarchiv, Fasc. 86, No. 74
Report of Friedrich Karl to Lothar Franz, undated, Vienna, Schönbornarchiv, Familienarchiv, Fasc. 86, No. 69.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 126.
Lothar Franz to the Electors of Trier and the Palatinate, 26 July 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 126.
John Philip Francis to Lothar Franz, 7 August 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 127.
Gudenus to Lothar Franz, 21 August 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 128; report of Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold 13 August 1700, Reichskanzlei, Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 128; L. Ennen, Der Spanische Erbfolgekrieg und der Kurfürst Johann Klement (Jena: Mauke, 1851), p. 62 and p. 65.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 128–129.
Ibid., p. 129.
Ibid.
Lothar Franz to Joseph Clement and Johann Hugo, 17 November 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Nada [John Langdon Davies], Carlos the Bewitched (London: Jonathan Cape, 1963), pp. 251–257. Don Carlos died on the afternoon of 1 November; news of his death was known in Paris by 9 November, but does not appear to have been known in Central Europe until around the middle of the month.
Joseph Clement to Lothar Franz, 1 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99. But of course he never withdrew it
Louis XIV notified the major German princes of his action on 21 November: M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
J. H. Plumb, Sir Robert Walpole (London: The Cresset Press, 1956), I, 93–96; Ogg, op. cit., pp. 459–460.
Joseph Clement to Lothar Franz, 9 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fasc. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 131.
Ibid.
Stadion to Lothar Franz, 13 December 1700, M.E.A., Korrespondenz, Fase. 99.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 132.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 133.
Wolf, op. cit., pp. 62–63.
O. Redlich, Die österreichische Grossmachtbildung in der Zeit Kaiser Leopolds I (Gotha: F. A. Perthes, 1921), p. 509.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 135; B. Erdmannsdörffer, Deutsche Geschichte, Vol. II, pp. 71 ff.
R. Fester, “Franken und die Kreisverfassung,” Neujahrsblätter herausgegeben von der Gesellschaft für fränkische Geschichte, I (1906), passim
H. H. Kaufmann, “Der Gedanke fränkischen Gemeinschaftsgefühls in Politik u. Geschichte des fränkischen Reichskreises,” Archiv des historischen Vereins von Unterfranken, LXIX (September 1934).
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 136. There is an account of the Heidenheim Association in M.E.A., Kreisakten, Fasc. 21. See also Kopp, op. cit., pp. 141 ff.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 136.
Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 14 September and 7 December 1700, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16. Bittner and Gross, op. cit., p. 140.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.
H. Polster, “Der Markgraf Christian Ernst von Brandenburg-Bayreuth und seine Rolle in der Reichskriegen 1689–1701,” Erlanger Abhandlungen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte, XXIII (1935), 50.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 137.
Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 10 January 1701, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 138.
Polster, op. cit., p. 67.
Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 10 February 1701, R.K., Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 12 March 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a. Rousseau de Chamoy was properly accredited only to the Imperial Diet.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 9 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
Wild, op. cit., p. 107, citing Theatrum Europaeum, Vol. XVI, pp. 493–494.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 139.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 29 January and 23 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a. For the Emperor’s army at this time: Braubach, Eugen, Vol. I, pp. 315–316.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 29 January and 23 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
A. Gaedeke, Die Politik Oesterreich in der spanischen Erbfolgefrage (2 vols.; Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1877), Vol. II, pp. 93, 96 and 98.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 141.
Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 10 February 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 4 March 1701, ibid.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 23 March 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 6 April 1701, ibid.
G. F. Preuss, “König Wilhelm III, Bayern und die Grosse Allianz, 1701,” Historische Zeitschrift, N.F. LVII (1904), 198.
André Lebon, ed., Recueil des Instructions, (Paris: F. Alcan, 1889), Vol. VII, p. 108.
Preuss, op. cit., p. 224.
Heiss von Kockenheim to Lothar Franz, 5 April 1701, M.E.A., Korrespon-denz, Fasc. 51.
Lothar Franz to Wratislaw, 13 April 1701, M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
M.E.A., Friedensakten, Fasc. 84a.
Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Schlick to Leopold, 7 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, ibid.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 144–145.
Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Schlick to Leopold, 7 April 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Schlick to Leopold, 14 April 1701, ibid.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., pp. 144–145.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 146.
Postrimerías, Vol. V, p. 591, n. 1.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 146.
Polster, op. cit., p. 70 ff.
Wratislaw to Lothar Franz, 14 June and 19 July 1701, M.E.A., Friedens-akten, Fasc. 84a; Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 25 June 1701, R.K. Berichte aus dem Reich, Fasc. 16.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 147.
Löwenstein-Wertheim to Leopold, 2 May 1701; Max Emanuel had sold out to France months before and Joseph Clement had preceded him.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148. The Emperor was, indeed, a belligerent, as his forces under Prince Eugene had invaded Upper Italy in May. Cf. Braubach, Eugen, Vol. I, pp. 315 ft
For the congress of Heilbronn; reports of Löwenstein-Wertheim, 28 August and 31 August 1701, loc. cit.; Kopp, op. cit., pp. 148 ff; S. Riezler, Geschichte Bayerns (2nd ed.; Gotha: F. A. Perthes, 1927), pp. 519 ff.
Polster, op. cit., pp. 73 ff.
Imperial instruction to Schlick, 5 August 1701, R.K., Instruktionen, Fasc. 13.
Report by Löwenstein-Wertheim, 24 May 1701.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148, from instruction of 18 May 1701, R.K. Weisungen ins Reich, Fasc. 7.
Instruction to Schlick, 14 August 1701.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 148.
Stepney, the well-informed English envoy, believed that Schlick’s success with the southern princes broke the last links between Leopold and Max Emanuel, Preuss, op. cit., p. 218.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 149.
Borodajkewycz, op. cit., p. 149. From the dispatches of Schlick, 1, 3, and 9 October 1701 and Lothar Franz’s declaration, 20 October, R. K. Moguntina, Fasc. 12a. Cf. Wild, op. cit., p. 107.
Bittner, op. cit., I, pp. 119 ff.
Schlick to Leopold, 9 October 1701.
Schlick to Leopold, 9 October 1701.
Wild, op. cit., p. 108.
Ibid.
Ibid.
G. A. Süss, “Geschichte des oberrheinischen Kreises… 1696–1714,” Zeit-schrift für die Geschichte des Oberrheins, LXIV (1955), 2. Heft, p. 391.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, R.H. (1973). Lothar Franz von Schönborn and the Spanish Succession 1699–1701. In: Lothar Franz von Schönborn and the Diplomacy of the Electorate of Mainz. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2389-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2389-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1346-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2389-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive