Advertisement

Lothar Franz von Schönborn: Bishop of Bamberg and Elector of Mainz, 1655–1695

Chapter
  • 37 Downloads
Part of the Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARMI, volume 5)

Abstract

The life and ambitions of Lothar Franz von Schönborn become intelligible if one considers the history and ambitions of his immediate forebears. At the time of Lothar Franz’s birth in 1655, his uncle John Philip had been a sovereign prince of the Empire for a mere thirteen years, having been elected bishop of Würzburg in 1642 and elector of Mainz in 1647. Thus the Schönborns, with at least four centuries as landowners in the Westerwald and the Lahn valley in their past, were newcomers to the ranks of the reigning princes. The so-called golden century of the family, which had begun with the election of John Philip at Würzburg reached its center — and perhaps its high point — with the activities of Lothar Franz before the War of the Spanish Succession and ended at Würzburg in the mid-eighteenth century with the death of Friedrich Karl, the nephew of Lothar Franz.1

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Territorial State Electoral Household Imperial Court Noble Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Otto Meyer, Kurfürst Lothar Franz von Schönborn inmitten der Geschichte seiner Zeit und seines Hauses (Bamberg and Wiesbaden: Bayerische Verlagsanstalt, 1957), p. 4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See B. H. Slicher van Bath, The Agrarian History of Western Europe A.D. 500–1850 (London: Edward Arnold, 1963), pp. 206–220.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer, op. cit., p. 5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For dramatic mortuary portraits of Lothar Franz’ parents, at Geisenheim, see R. Hootz, Deutsche Kunstdenkmäler: Hessen (Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 1964), p. 133. The sculptor was Mathias Rauchmüller.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    For the curriculum of a comparable Jesuit academy at Bamberg in the years 1646–47, see Bernhard Duhr, ed., Ratio studiorum et institutionés scholasticae Societatis Jesu (4 vols.; Berlin: A. Hofmann & Co., 1887–1894), Vol. III, pp. 260–262Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    in the series Karl Kehrbach, ed. Monumenta Germaniae Paedagogica (Berlin: A. Hofmann & Co., 1885-). Lothar Franz was a lifelong friend of the Society and took their side in the Chinese Rites controversy.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Karl Wild, Lothar Franz von Schönborn, Bischof von Bamberg und Erzbischof von Mainz 1693–1729. Ein Beitrag zur Staats- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts, Heidelberger Abhandlungen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte, 8. Heft (Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1904), p. 5.Google Scholar
  8. 6a.
    A. Amrhein, “Die Mitglieder des adeligen Domstifts zu Würzburg,” Archiv des historischen Vereins fur Unterfranken, XXXIII (1890), 208.Google Scholar
  9. 6b.
    Walter Tunk, ed., Kurfürst Lothar Franz von Schönborn 1655–1729. Gedächtnisausstellung zur 300-Jahr-Feier seines Geburtstages (Bamberg: St. Otto Verlag, 1955), p. 112. The Bamberg Staatsarchiv possesses the chapter’s Rezessbuch for 1667 (B86II, No. 40) with the notation of Lothar Franz’ reception as canonicus. Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Meyer, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    For a portrait of this prelate, on a Bamberg Thaler of 1687, see J. Kist, Fürst- und Erzbistum Bamberg: Leitfaden durch ihre Geschichte von 1007 bis 1960 (3rd ed.; Bamberg: St. Otto Verlag, 1962), p. 112.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 6, citing the Wiesentheid Archives, fasc. 29, for correspondence between Marquard Sebastian and Lothar Franz in 1689.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    J. Looshorn, Die Geschichte des Bisthums Bamberg, vol. VI (Bamberg: Verlag und Druck der Handels-Druckerei, 1906), p. 547.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Schönborn Archives, Wiesentheid, fasc. 584, instructions to von Eck, November 4, 1693.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Zodiacus Symbolicus (Bambergae typis episcopalibus apvd. Joh. Jac. Immel, n. d. [1693?]).Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Georg Weigel, Die Wahlkapitulationen der Bamberger Bischöfe, (Bamberg: Verlag der Schmidtsche Buchhandlung von R. A. Burger, 1909), p. 122.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Looshorn, op. cit., VI, p. 568.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 7. Innocent XII assented to Lothar Franz’ election as Bishop of Bamberg in the bull A postolatus officium, dated January 4, 1694 (Bamberg, Staatsarchiv, A23, Urkunde 228, Lade 26). The bull of felicitation, Gavisi Admodum fuimus, dated January 23, 1694, followed. (Bamberg, Staatsarchiv, A23, Urkunde 227, Lade 26). The Emperor invested Lothar Franz with the Imperial fief of the episcopal principality of Bamberg on August 19, 1694. (Bamberg, Staatsarchiv, A20, Urkunde 162, Lade 6).Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    H. Polster, Der Markgraf Christian Ernst von Brandenburg-Bayreuth und seine Rolle in den Reichskriegen (Erlangen: Palm und Enke, 1935), p. 10.Google Scholar
  23. 25a.
    For the boundaries of the Circles, see Josef Engel, ed., Grosser Historischer Weltatlas, vol. III (2nd revised ed.; Munich: Bayerischer Schulbuch-Verlag 1962), map 110b.Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    R. E. Dickinson, Germany: A General and Regional Geography (London: Methuen, 1953), p. 550.Google Scholar
  25. 26a.
    Cf. M. R. Shackleton, Europe (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1950), p. 285.Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    Wm. M. Conway, ed., The Literary Remains of Albrecht Dürer (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1889), p. 93, with reference to a journey made in 1520; but surely the situation had not altered substantially by the 1690’s.Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    J. G. Keyssler, Travels through Germany, Bohemia, Hungary, etc., (4 vols.; London: A. Linde and T. Field, 1756–1757), Vol. IV, p. 168. The first German edition was issued in 1740.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    Ibid., p. 169.Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    Ibid., p. 170.Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    Matthias Merian, in Topographia Franconiae (Facsimile ed.; Kassel and Basel: Bärenreiter Verlag, 1962), p. 23, reported that no place in Germany grew as much saffron as Bamberg and went on to describe the natural products of the area in almost exactly the same language used by Keyssler, three-quarters of a century later, which is not surprising, as travel writers in the eighteenth century, even when they had actually seen a place, would often borrow the language of some earlier traveler to describe it.Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 11. A German Meile (7500 meters) is equal to 4.6109 English miles.Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    For the physical situation of Bamberg, see A. von Reitzenstein, Franken (Munich: Prestei Verlag, 1955), pp. 88–89.Google Scholar
  34. 34a.
    Karl Baedeker, Northern Bavaria (Hamburg: Karl Baedeker, 1951), pp. 62–70.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Merian, op. cit., p. 25.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    For a summary of the history of the town from its beginnings to the end of the Thirty Years’ War, see Kist, op. cit., pp. 9–107.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ibid., pp. 108–109.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ibid., pp. 110–111.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alfred Baudrillart, ed., Dictionnaire déhistoire et de géographie ecclésiastiques, (15 vols.; Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1912–1949), Vol. VI, p. 467. The new palace was incomplete at the time of Marquard Sebastian’s death and was finished by Lothar Franz in 1699. With its four corner towers, Seehof is strongly reminiscent of the castle at Aschaffenburg.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kist, op. cit., p. 112. For the eastern war which culminated in the siege of Vienna in September, 1683.Google Scholar
  41. 40a.
    See John Stoye, The Siege of Vienna (London: Collins, 1964).Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Kist, op. cit., p. 113.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Hans von Zwiedeneck-Südenhorst, Die öffentliche Meinung in Deutschland im Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV. (1650–1750), (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta Verlag, 1888, passim). Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    Max Braubach, Prinz Eugen von Savoy en, Vol. I: Aufstieg (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1963), pp. 150–152.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Braubach, op. cit., p. 152.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 14.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    Ludwig Anton of Pfalz-Neuburg (1660–1694) was elected bishop of Worms in 1691. His older brother, John William, Elector Palatine (1658–1716), was one of the most devoted supporters of the Imperial cause during the War of the Spanish Succession. At one time he aspired to be King of Armenia. We shall encounter him again. Ludwig Anton’s sister, Eleonore (1655–1720), was the third wife of the Emperor Leopold and mother of the Emperors Joseph I and Karl VI. A younger brother, Karl Philip (1661–1742) succeeded John William — “Jan Willem” to his Catholic subjects — as Elector Palatine in 1716. Franz Ludwig (1664–1732), who was the loser in the coadjutorial election at Mainz in 1694, had been elected bishop of Breslau in 1683, Bishop of Worms in 1694 and Elector of Trier in 1716. He succeeded Lothar Franz at Mainz in 1729, having been made coadjutor in 1709. Cf. Max Braubach, “Johann Wilhelm, Kurfürst von der Pfalz,” in E. Strutz, ed., Rheinische Lebensbilder, (Düsseldorf: Rheinland Verlag, 1961), Vol. I, pp. 83–101, especially the genealogical table, pp. 84–85. The office of Count Palatine originated in the reign of the Emperor Otto I. There were four counts in the tenth century, who kept watch on the territorial dukes somewhat in the manner of the Carolingian Missi dominici. The count palatine of Lotharingia in the twelfth century was the founder of the Rhenish Palatine state. The office which Anton of Neuburg occupied in the seventeenth century, although Imperial, involved no substantive duties and was not attached to any sovereign territory. See M. Lintzel, “Der Ursprung der deutschen Pfalzgrafschaften,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-StiftungGermanische Abteilung, XLIX (1929).Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 8.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 8. Wild found the memorial, dated August 1, 1694, in the Wiesentheid Archives, fasc. 567.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    See Gilbert Burnet, Some Letters…, (3rd ed., Rotterdam, no publ, 1687), p. 289.Google Scholar
  51. 50a.
    Wild, op. cit., pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
  53. 54.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 10. Wild wrote “… sein neuburgisches Regiment verpflegen müssen.” It is not clear whether he meant Regiment in the sense of government or whether he was referring to the Neuburg infantry regiment, later renowned as the Deutschmeister regiment of the Habsburg army. See Aloys Schulte, Ludwig Wilhelm von Baden, Vol. I (Karlsruhe: J. Bielefeld’s Verlag, 1892), p. 94.Google Scholar
  54. 55.
    The Assignationen were financial contributions made by the states of the Empire to support the armed forces of the Circles and of the Emperor. See Schulte, op. cit., I, p. 347, n. 2.Google Scholar
  55. 56.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 10.Google Scholar
  56. 57.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 10. The election and confirmation of the new coadjutor took place in the midst of a controversy, which originated at Würzburg, over the respective rights of the German bishops and their chapters. Between 1685 and 1695, bishop John Gottfried II of Würzburg had been in conflict with his chapter. The bishop appealed to the Pope and the Emperor, with the result that the powers of the chapter to bind the bishop by electoral capitulations were greatly reduced. On September 22, 1695, Pope Innocent XII, in the bull Innocentiana issued a general prohibition against the imposition of electoral capitulations on bishops and against binding engagements made prior to election. Later, Innocent XII added codicils which made the confirmation of episcopal elections the responsibility of the Roman Curia. The Emperor assented to those arrangements in 1698. See Fritz Hartung, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, (8th ed., Stuttgart: K. F. Koehler Verlag, 1950), p. 145.Google Scholar
  57. 57a.
    Baudrillart, op. cit., Vol. IV, col. 469, reports that after the promulgation of the Innocentiana, the German bishops owed their chapters only insignificant tokens of submission: “quelques ‘souvenirs’.”Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 10. Innocent XII confirmed the election of Lothar Franz as coadjutor in the bull Hodie verierabilem fratrem, Rome, 1695.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    “Von Boyneburg, Philipp Wilhelm,” Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, Vol. III, p. 224.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
  61. 62.
    W. Tunk, ed., Kurfürst Lothar Franz von Schönborn 1655–1729…, (Bamberg: St. Otto Verlag, 1955), p. 25.Google Scholar
  62. 63.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
  63. 63a.
    See G. Franz, Deutsche Bauernkrieg (4th ed., Darmstadt: H. Gentner Verlag, 1956), pp. 232–235.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Meyer, op. cit., p. 10.Google Scholar
  65. 66.
    Tunk, op. cit., p. 26.Google Scholar
  66. 67.
    Wild, op. cit., p. 14.Google Scholar
  67. 68.
    K. H. Esser, Aus Kurmainzer Zeit (Mainz: Altertumsmuseum und Gemäldegalerie der Stadt Mainz, 1957), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
  68. 69.
    Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1973

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations