Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 8))

Abstract

While it certainly has proved expedient to describe people’s behavior in terms of probabilities, it is not clear whether, to what extent, or under what conditions, it is admissable to identify actual behavior with some reasonably well-fitting probabilistic description of it. What the authors call the confusion problem arises where such admissibility is implicitly assumed. Some examples of this problem are discussed, viz. those accruing from the determination of subjective probability as degree of felt certainty. A more detailed analysis is presented of the problem of changes in feelings of uncertainty, defined as revisions of opinion.

It appears from these examples that people seem to programme their behavior on the basis of rules, derived from ‘computational structures’. Such structures provide actions optimal and efficient in most familiar situations, are apparently easy to handle, but are not necessarily probabilistic in nature, even where uncertainty prevails.

Three research programmes to identify these computational structures are discussed. One shows grave dangers, and can lead to confusion, while the other two are considered as most promising provided ‘imitability’ is taken as an additional criterion of evaluation. This concept seems to be useful as a tool to find some meaningful ideas of what people do, when faced with uncertainty.

Authorship is equally shared.

This paper was written in 1972; no recent material has been included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, N.H., ‘A Simple Model for Information Integration’, in R.P., Abelson, E., Afonson, W.J., McGuire, T.M., Newcomb. M.J., Rosenberg, and P.H., Tannenbaum (eds). Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Rand McNally. Chicago, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J H., ‘Comments on a New Risk Taking Model’, Acta Psychologica 35 (1971) 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R C., Bower, G.H., and Crothers, E.J., An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theory, Wiley. New York. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A.D., ‘The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1966), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, S., and Beach, L.R., ‘Combinatorial Properties of Personal Probabilities’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 8 (1972), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M., ‘Accuracy and Congruence in Estimations of Probability and Odds from Binomial Distributions’. Umeå Psychological Reports. No. 36. Univ. of Umed. Sweden, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R., ‘Accuracy and Consistency in the Revision of Subjective Probabilities’, IEEE Transactions in Human Factors in Electronics HFE-7 (1966), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R., and Peterson, C.R., ‘Subjective Probabilities for Unions of Events’, Psychonomic Science 5 (1966), 307–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R., Wise, J A., and Barclay, S., ‘Sample Proportions and Subjective Probability Revisions’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 5 (1970), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beenen, F., ‘Psychiatric Diagnosis and Subjective Probabilities’, Acta Psychologica 34 (1970), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G H., ‘Application of a Model to Paired-Associate Learning’, Psychometrika 26 (1961), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, H.D., An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Ginn and Company, Boston. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., ‘Subjective Probability’, Scientific American, Nov. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Psychological Probability, or the Art of Doubt, Georg Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., and Hansel, C.E M., ‘The Nature of Decisions in Gambling’, Acta Psychologica 13 (1958), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Chesnick, E.I., and Haran, D., ‘A Confirmation of the Inertial-ψ Effect in Sequential Choice and Decision’, British Journal of Psychology 63 (1972), 41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Dearnaley, E.J., and Hansel, C.E.M., ‘The Addition of Subjective Probabilities’. Acta Psychologica 12 (1956), 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Dearnaley, E.J., and Hansel, C.E.M., ‘Measures of Subjective Probability’. British Journal of Psychology 48 (1957), 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Deamaley, E. J., and Hansel, C.E.M., ‘The Mutual Effect of Two Uncertainties’. Durham Research Review 2 (1958), 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, D., van. ‘Statistical Priesthood’ (Savage on Personal Probabilities), Statistica Neerlandia 2 (1957), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks, P.L., and House, J.L., ‘Effect of Event Run Structure on Prediction of Recursive Binary’ Sequences’, Psychological Reports 17 (1965). 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks, P.L., and House, J.L., ‘The Prediction and Acquisition of Sequential Patterns of Binary Events’. British Journal of Psychology 61 (1970), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Charme, W. ‘Response Bias Explanation of Conservative Human Inference’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85 (1970), 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., ‘Subjective Probabilities Inferred from Decisions’. Psychological Review 69 (1962), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., ‘Conservatism in Human Information Processing’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, Wiley, New York, 1968, pp. 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W, Lindman, H., and Savage, LJ., ‘Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research’. Psychological Review 70 (1963), 193–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., Phillips, L.D., Hays, W.L., and Goodman, B. G., ‘Probabilistic Information Processing Systems: Design and Evaluation’. IEEE Traniactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics SSC-4 (1968), 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W K., ‘Individual Behavior in Uncertain Situations: An Interpretation in Terms of Statistical Association Theory’, in R.M., Thrall, C.H., Coombs, and R.L., Davis (eds), Decision Processes. Wiley, New York, 1954, pp. 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W.K., ‘Growth and Function of Mathematical Models for Learning’, in Current Trends in Psychological Theory. Univ. of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburgh, 1961, pp. 134–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W K., ‘Probability Learning’, in A.W., Melton (ed.). Categories of Human Learning, Academic Press, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W.K., Learning Theory and Mental Development, Academic Press. London. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J., ‘Simulation of Behavior in the Binary Choice Experiment’, in E.A., Feigenbaum and J., Feldman (eds.), Computers and Thought. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B., de, Logical Foundations and Measurement of Subjective Probability’, Acta Poincare 7 (1937). 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B., de, ‘Logical Foundations and Measurement of Subjective Probability’, Acta Psychologies 34(1970), 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, LJ., The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayetian Methods, MIT Press, Cambndge, Mass, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.R., ‘From Probability Learning to Sequential Processing: A Critical Review’, Psychological Bulletin 76 (1971), 153–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., ‘Subjective Probability A Judgment of Representativeness’, Cognitive Psychology 3 (1972), 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner, S., ‘Some Types of Philosophical Thinking’, in C.A., Mace (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-Century. George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H.E., Philosophy of Science. A Formal Approach, MacMillan, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W., Decision Theory and Human Behavior, Wiley, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.V., ‘Probabilities and the Law’, Working paper, prepared for The 3rd Research Conference on Subjective Probability. Utility, and Decision-Making London, 1971 (proceedings in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordahl, D.S., ‘An Hypothesis Approach to Sequential Predictions of Binary Events’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 7 (1970), 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovie, A.D., and Davies, A.D.M., ‘An Application of Bayes’ Theorem to Person Perception The Effect of Rate of Revision and Initial Revision on the Perception of Another’s Age’, Acta Psychology 34 (1970), 322–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, W., ‘Experiments on Probabilistic Information Processing’, Acta Psvchologica 34 (1970), 184–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D.F., and Clarkson, J.K., ‘An Explanation of Conservatism in the Book Bag-and-Poker Chip Situation’, Acta Psvchologica 36 (1972). 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D.M., ‘Learning Probabilities of Events: A Discussion’, Acta Psychologica 34 (1970), 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., and Frick, F.C., ‘Statistical Bchavioristics and Sequences of Responses’, Psychological Review 56 (1949), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, R., von, in H., Geiringen (ed.). Probability. Statistics and Truth, Allen & Unwin. London. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C.G., ‘Theoretical Relationships Among Some Measures of Conditioning’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 36 (1950), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organist, W.E.. ‘Use of Subjective Probabilities as a Response Technique in Multiple-Choice Behavior’. Paper read at meetings of the Psychometric Society 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.R., and Miller, A.J., ‘Sensitivity of Subjective Probability Revisions’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1965), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.R., Schneider, R.J., and Miller, A.J., ‘Sample Size and the Revision of Subjective Probabilities’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1965), 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.R, Ulehla, Z.J., Miller, A.J., Bourne, L.E., and Stilson, P.W., ‘Internal Consistency of Subjective Probabilities’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1965). 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D., ‘The “True Probability” Problem’. Acta Psychology 34 (1970), 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D. and Edwards, W., ‘Conservatism in a Simple Probability Inference Task’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1966), 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D., Hays, W.L., and Edwards, W., ‘Conservatism in Complex Probabilistic Inference’, IEEE Transactions in Human Factors in Electronics HFE-7 (1966), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitz, G.F., ‘Sample Size, Likelihood, and Confidence in a Decision’. Psychonomic Science 8 (1967), 257–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitz, G. F., ‘An Inertia Effect (Resistance to Change) in the Revision of Opinion’. Canadian Journal of Psychology 23 (1969), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., and Wallsten, T.S., ‘Individual Decision Behavior’, Annual Review of Psychology 23 (1972), 131–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J., The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senders, V.L., ‘Further Analysis of Response Sequences in the Selling of a Psychophysical Experiment’. American Journal of Psychology 66 (1953), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senders, V.L. and Sowards, A., ‘Analysis of Response Sequences in the Setting of a Psychophysical Experiment’, American Journal of Psychology 65 (1952), 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J.C., ‘An Additive Model for Sequential Decision Making’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (1970), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S., ‘Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing Judgment’. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6 (1971), 649–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staël von Holstein, C.A.S., ‘Measurement of Subjective Probability’, Acta Psychologica 34 (1970), 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, M., ‘Algebraic Models in Dynamic Decision Theory’, in C.A.J., Vlek (ed.), Algebraic Models in Psychology, Proceedings of the NUFFIC International Summer Session in Science, The Hague. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tune, G S., ‘Response Preferences: A Review of Some Relevant Literature’, Psychological Bulletin 61 (1964). 286–320 (a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tune, G. S., ‘A Brief Survey of Variables that Influence Random Generation’, Perception and Motor Skills 8 (1964). 705–710 (b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., ‘Belief in the Law of Small Numbers’, Psychological Bulletin 76 (1971), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., ‘Availability as a Determinant of Frequency and Probability Judgments’, Oregon Research Institute Technical Report 12 (1), (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P.C., and Todd, T.C., ‘A Model of Learning for Simple Repeating Binary Patterns’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1967). 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P.C. and Todd, T.C., ‘A Coded Element Model of the Perceptual Processing of Sequential Stimuli’. Psychological Review 76 (1969), 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C.A.J., ‘The Use of Probabilistic Information in Decision-Making’. Report 009-65, Psychological Institute, Univ. of Leyden 1965, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C.A.J., ‘Coherence of Human Judgment in a Limited Probabilistic Environment’. Report 031-72, Psychological Institute, University of Leyden 1972. The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A, ‘Sequential Response Bias in Psychophysical Experiments’. Perception and Psychophysicj 3 (1968), 364–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A., ‘On the Measurement of ‘the’ Subjective Sampling Distribution’, Paper presented at the 3rd Research Conference on Subjectire Probability. Utility, and Decision-Making. London 1971 (proceedings in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A., ‘Generation of Random Sequences by Human Subjects: A Critical Survey of Literature’. Psychological Bulletin 71 (1972), 63–72 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A., ‘Sequential Response Bias’. The Institute for Perception TNO. Soesterberg, Netherlands. 1972 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.L., ‘Variables That Influence Random-Generation. An Alternative Hypothesis’, Perception arj Motor Skills 20 (1965), 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R.L., The Assetsment of Prior Distributions in Bayeuan Analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (1967). 770–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, J.A., ‘Origins of Subjective Probability’, Acta Psychologica 34 (1970), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Zeeuw, G., Wagenaar, W.A. (1974). Are Subjective Probabilities Probabilities?. In: Staël Von Holstein, CA.S. (eds) The Concept of Probability in Psychological Experiments. Theory and Decision Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2290-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2288-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics