The Psychological Concept of Subjective Probability: A Measurement-Theoretic View

  • Thomas S. Wallsten
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Decision Library book series (TDLU, volume 8)

Abstract

A point of view is presented concerning the psychological concept of subjective probability, both to study its relation to the corresponding mathematical and philosophical concepts and to provide a framework for the rigorous investigation of problems unique to psychology. In order to do this the empirical implications of axiom systems for measurement are discussed first, relying primarily on Krantz’s work, with special emphasis, however, on some similarities and differences between psychological and physical variables. The psychological variable of uncertainty is then examined in this light, and it is concluded that few, if any, current theories of subjective probability are satisfactory when viewed from this perspective, including those deriving from the mathematical work in the axiomatic foundations of probability. This might appear to pose difficulties for applications to real problems of normative decision theory when those applications require numerical probability judgments from individuals. Two possible solutions are discussed briefly

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alpert, M., and Raiffa, H., ‘A Progress Report on the Training of Probability Assessors’, Harvard University Unpublished Manuscript (1969).Google Scholar
  2. Beach, L.R., and Phillips, L., ‘Subjective Probabilities Inferred from Estimates and Bets’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1967). 354–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, S W., and Brownson, F. O., ‘What Price Ambiguity? Or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision Making’, The Journal of Political Economy 72 (1964), 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, N.R., Foundations of Science: the Philosophy of Theory and Experiment, New York 1957 (originally published as Physics: the Elements, Cambridge, England. 1920 ).Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, P., Suppes, P., and Siegel, S., Decision Making An Experimental Approach, Stanford 1957.Google Scholar
  6. de Finetti, B., ‘La Provision: Ses Lois Logiques. Sei Sources Subjective’,Annales de l’Institut Henri Poiniure 7 (1937). 1–68 (English translation in H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokier (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability New York and London 1964. pp 93–158).Google Scholar
  7. De Groot, M.H., Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, W., ‘Conservatism in Human Information Processine.’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.). Formal Representation of Human Judgment New York. pp. 17–52.Google Scholar
  9. Ellsberg, D., ‘Risk. Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms’, Quarterly Journal of Economia 75 (1961). 641–669.Google Scholar
  10. Fishbum, P., ‘Prcfcrencc-Based Definitions of Subjective Probability’, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38 (1967). 1605–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishbum, P., ‘Weak Qualitative Probability on Finite Sets’, The Annals of MathematicaI Statistics 40 (1969), 2118–2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishburn, P., Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, J. and Peterson, C, C., ‘A Scoring Rule to Train Probability Assessor’. Engineering Psychology Laboratory Technical Report. Univ. of Michigan (1972).Google Scholar
  14. Irwin, F.W., Intentional Behavior and Motivation: A Cognitive Theory. Philadelphia 1971.Google Scholar
  15. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., ‘Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness’. Cognitive Psychology 3 (1972), 430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koch, S., (ed.), Psychology A Study of a Science. Vol. 2, New York 1959.Google Scholar
  17. Koopman, B.O., ‘The Axiomsand Algebra of Intuitive Probability’, Annals of Mathematics 41 (1940). 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraft, C.H., Pratt, J.W., and Scidenberg, A., ‘Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets’, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30 (1959), 408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krantz, D.H., ‘A Survey of Measurement Theory’, in Mathematics of the Decision Sciences. Part 2, Vol. 12. Lectures in Applied Mathematics (ed. by G.B. Danzig and A. F. Veinott. Jr. ), Providence 1968, pp. 314–350.Google Scholar
  20. Krantz, D.H., ‘Measurement Structures and Psychological Laws’, Science 175 (1972a). 1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krantz, D.H, , ‘Measurement Theory and Qualitative Laws in Psychophysics’, Michigan Mathematical Psychology Program Technical Report MMPP 72-3, Univ. of Michigan (1972b).Google Scholar
  22. Krantz, D H., Luce, R D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A., Foundations of Measurement. Vol I. Additive and Polynomial Representations, New York and London 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Krantz, D.H., and Tversky, A., ‘Conjoint Measurement Analysis of Composition Rules in Psychology’, Psychological Review 78 (1971), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luce, R D., ‘Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Finitely Additive Probability Measure’, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38 (1967), 780–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luce, R.D., ‘What Sort of Measurement Is Psychophysical Measurement?’, American Psychologist 27 (1972), 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luce, R.D., and Krantz, D.H., ‘Conditional Expected Utility’, Econometrica 39 (1971), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luce, R.D., and Tukey, J.W., ‘Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 (1964), 1–27,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P.E., ‘On a Distinction Between Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables’, Psychological Reviev, 55 (1948). 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marx, M H, Theories in Contemporary Psychology, New York and London. 1964.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, A.H., and Epstein, E.S., ‘Verfication of Probabilistic Predictions: A Brief Review’ Journal of Applied Meteorology 6 (1967), 745–755.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, A.H., and Winkler, R.L., ‘Scoring Rules in Probability Assessment and Evaluation’, Acta Psychology 34 (1970), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy, A.H., and Winkler, R L., ‘Forecasts and Probability Forecasts: Some Current Problems’. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 52 (1971), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H., and Schlaifer, R., Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory ( Preliminary Edition ). New York 1965.Google Scholar
  34. Rapoport, A., and Wallsten, T.S., ‘Individual Decision Behavior’, Annual Review of Psychology 23 (1972). 131–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savage, L.J., The Foundations of Statistics, New York 1954.Google Scholar
  36. Staël von Holstein, C-A.S., Assessment and Evaluation of Subjective Probability Distributions, Stockholm 1970.Google Scholar
  37. Tolman, E.C., ‘Operational Behaviorism and Current Trends in Psychology’, in Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Celebrating the Inauguration of Graduate Studies. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles 1936, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar
  38. Tversky, A., ‘Additivity, Utility, and Subjective Probability’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4 (1967). 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., ‘Availability as a Determinant of Frequency and Probability Judgments’, Oregon Research Institute Technical Report 12. No. 1 (1972).Google Scholar
  40. Villigas, C. ‘On Qualitative Probability σ-Algebras’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35 (1964). 1787–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Villigas, C., ‘On Qualitative Probability’. American Mathematical Monthly 74 (1967), 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Von Neuman, J., and Morgenyem, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton 1944.Google Scholar
  43. Wallsten. T S., ‘Subjects’ Probability Estimates and Subjectively Expected Utility Theory: Their Relationship and Some Limitations’. Psychometric Laboratory Report No. 85, Univ. of North Carolina (1970).Google Scholar
  44. Wallsten, T S., ‘Subjectively Expected Utility Theory and Subjects’ Probability Estimates: Use of Measurement-Free Techniques’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1971). 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallsten, T.S., ‘Conjoint Measurement Framework for the Study of Probabilistic Information Processing’. Psychological Reviews 79 (1972). 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winkler, R.L., ‘The Assessment of Prior Distributions in Bayesian Analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (1967), 776–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Winkler, R.L., ‘The Consensus of Subjective Probability Distributions’. Management Science 15 (1968). B-61–B-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winkler, R.L., and Murphy, A.H., ‘Good’ Probability Assessors’. Journal of Applleii Meteorology 7 (1968), 751–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wise, J.A., ‘Origins ol Subjective Probability’, Acta Psychology 34 (1970), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Wallsten
    • 1
  1. 1.L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, Department of PsychologyUniversity of North CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations