Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 8))

Abstract

Confusion must be avoided between two different meanings given to ‘Subjective Probability’, and the ensuing kind of problems concerning this notion. Subjectivists maintain that every probability is subjective, inasmuch as it is the ‘degree of belief’ of someone facing an uncertain event. Some psychologists call ‘subjective’ a distorted or inaccurate estimation of something that could be meant as (in a sense) ‘true’ probability. The S-P problem is, in the first case, that of properly clarifying the role of subjective weighing of any relevant element for an accurate assessment of any probability feeling; in the second, it concerns, on the other hand, the ‘misleading’ influence of possible ‘subjective’ factors.

This paper was first presented as the final discussion at the Research Conference on Subjective Probability and Related Fields that was held in Hamburg on April 10–12, 1969. The discussion was made in relation to the papers that had been presented on psychological experiments; it contains some references to these papers, which were only summarized in the mimeographed conference proceedings. The present paper represents a slightly abridged version of the original paper; a few references have been brought up to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Coombs, C.H, ‘On the Use of Objective Examinations’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 13 (1953), 308–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H., Milholland, J.E., and Wormer, F. B., Educational and Psychological Measurement 16 (1956), 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B., ‘Does it Make Sense to Speak of Good Probability Appraisers?’, in I J Good (ed.). The Scientist Speculates An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas. Heinemann. London. 1962, pp. 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B., ‘Initial Probabilities: A Prerequisite for Any Valid Induction’, Synthese 20 (1969), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J., Discussion in: Induction. Physics, and Ethics, (ed. by P. Weingartner and G. Zecha ), D Reidel. Dordrecht. 1970. pp. 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, Jr., C.J., Decisions under Uncertainly. Drilling Decisions by Oil and Gas Operators, Harvard University Press, Boston. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, G., ‘Subjective Probabilities and Utilities in Non-Verbal Decision Processes’, in D. Wendt (ed.), Proceedings of a Research Conference on Subject tie Probability and Related Fields, Psychological Institute of the Univ. of Hamburg, Hamburg, 1969, pp. 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, W., ‘Strategies in Probability Learning’, in D. Wendt (ed.). Proceedings of a Research Conferente on Subjective Probability and Related fields, Psychological Institute of the Univ. of Hamburg, Hamburg, 1969. pp. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A.H., and Winkler, R.L, R.L., ‘Subjective Probability Forecasting in the Real World: Some Experimental Results’, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado and Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Indiana, unpublished manuscript. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuford, E.H., Albert, A., and Musengill, H.E., ‘Admissible Probability Measurement Procedures’, Psychometrika 31 (1966), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staël von Holstein, C.-A. S., ‘An Experiment in Probabilistic Weather Forecasting’, Journal of Applied Meteorology 10 (1971), 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staël von Holstein, C.-A. S., ‘Probabilistic Forecasting: An Experiment Related to the Stock Market’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 8 (1972), 139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., ‘Some Problems in Revision-of-Opinion Studies’, in D Wendt (ed), Proceedings of a Research Conference on Subjectire Probability and Related Fields. Psychological Institute of the Univ of Hamburg. Hamburg. 1969, pp 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R.L., ‘Probabilistic Prediction: Some Experimental Results’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 (1971), 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R L., and Murphy, A H. ‘Evaluation of Subjective Precipitation Probability Forecasts’, Proceeding of the First National Conference on StatLuical Meteorology American Meteorological Society, Boston, 1968, pp. 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Finetti, B. (1974). The True Subjective Probability Problem. In: Staël Von Holstein, CA.S. (eds) The Concept of Probability in Psychological Experiments. Theory and Decision Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2290-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2288-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics