The Dynamics of Auroral Absorption

  • J. K. Hargreaves
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 44)


The earliest riometer studies of auroral radio absorption paid little attention to movements. The first overt reference to them is probably a single example reported by Kavadas (1962). Evidence of movements can be seen in the diagrams of some other early papers (Little and Leinbach, 1958; Holt et al., 1962) though the authors do not draw attention to them in the text. Thus, most of the earlier investigations of auroral absorption (AA) concentrated on questions such as the mechanism of radio absorption and the nature of the primary particles, the synoptics of time and place of its occurrence, and on relationships with other auroral and geophysical phenomena. Towards the middle of the 1960’s there were further reports of AA movements, based on time differences between the appearance of bursts of activity at geographically separated stations (Eriksen et al., 1964; Ansari, 1965; Little et al., 1965), and there has been an increasing concentration on the dynamics of AA since that time. As a result, it is now realized that nearly all absorbing regions are in motion, that the motions are largely systematic, and that they occur on the global scale — that is, involve both night and day sectors and include the whole width of the auroral regions in both hemispheres. Clearly this has been a significant development and there can be little doubt that studies of the dynamics of auroral absorption represent one of the most important aspects of riometer work now and for the immediate future.


Zonal Velocity Wide Baseline Meridional Movement Auroral Luminosity Night Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ansari, Z. A.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 3117.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Driatsky, V. M.: 1969, Geomag. Aeron. 9, 398.Google Scholar
  3. Driatsky, V. M. and Shumilov, O. I: 1970, Geomag. Aeron. 10, 235.Google Scholar
  4. Driatsky, V. M., Shumilov, O. I., and Frank-Kamenetsky, A.I.: 1972, Geomag. Aeron. 12, 396.Google Scholar
  5. Eriksen, K. W., Gilmor, C. S., and Hargreaves, J. K.: 1964, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 26, 77.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hargreaves, J. K.: 1967, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 29, 1159.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hargreaves, J. K.: 1968, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 30, 1461.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargreaves, J. K.: 1969, Proc. IEEE 57, 1348.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hargreaves, J. K.: 1970, Planetary Space Sci. 18, 1691.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holt, O., Landmark, B., and Lied, F.: 1962, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 23, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jelly, D. H.: 1968, Can. J. Phys. 46, 33.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jelly, D. H.: 1970, Can. J. Phys. 48, 335.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jelly, D. H. and Brice, N. M.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5919.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kavadas, A.: 1962, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys. 23, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Little, C. G. and Leinbach, H.: 1958, Proc. IRE 46, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Little, C. G., Schiffmacher, E. R., Chivers, H. J. A., and Sullivan, K. W.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 639.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pudovkin, M. I. and Shumilov, O. I.: 1969, Ann. Geophys 25, 125.Google Scholar
  18. Pudovkin, M. I., Shumilov, O. I., and Zaitzeva, S. A.: 1968, Planetary Space Sci. 16, 881.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Theander, A.: 1972, Kiruna Geophysical Observatory Report 723.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Hargreaves
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LancasterLancasterEngland

Personalised recommendations