Abstract
Let us say that a set is a fragment of an ordinal if it can be obtained from an ordinal by removing certain sets (which are necessarily ordinals) from the ordinal and/or from the members of the ordinal and/or from the members of the members of the ordinal etc. As an example \(\left\{ {\left\{ {\left\{ {\left\{ {} \right\}} \right\}} \right\}} \right\}\) is a fragment of an ordinal since it can be obtained in the manner indicated below: Professor Kanger has raised the following problem: Is it true that * Every set is a fragment of an ordinal We prove the answer to be affirmative. Moreover we prove that the statement * when formalized as below in the language of set theory, is equivalent to the axiom of choice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ã…berg, C. (1974). Solution to a Problem Raised by Stig Kanger and a Set Theoretical Statement Equivalent to the Axiom of Choice. In: Stenlund, S., Henschen-Dahlquist, AM., Lindahl, L., Nordenfelt, L., Odelstad, J. (eds) Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis. Synthese Library, vol 63. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2193-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2191-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive