Abstract
One thing that everyone can agree on is that the subject of geometrodynamics, whatever we interpret it as covering, is inseparably associated with the name of John Wheeler. To discuss the history and current status of geometrodynamics thus necessitates the discussion of the evolution of Wheeler’s ideas on the subject. This is not meant to detract, in any way, from the fact that he has been ably assisted in his intellectual Odyssey by a distinguished group of co-workers; most prominently by Charles Misner, whom we have been fortunate to hear today on the subject. Since Professor Wheeler has recently indicated his abandonment of major features of the original geometrodynamic program, as I shall discuss later, I hope he will forgive me the rather dramatic title I have chosen for my talk.
I should like to thank Professor Wheeler for reading the typescript of this paper. His comments have enabled me to avoid misinterpretation of his position on at least one point; he is, of course, not responsible for any remaining misinterpretations or for my critical comments.
Research partially supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Einstein, ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court Publishing Co., LaSalle, III., 1970, pp. 71–73.
Ibid.>, pp. 73–75.
Ibid.>, p. 75.
Ibid.>, p. 81.
A. Einstein, ‘Remarks to the Essays Appearing in This Collective Volume’, Ibid.>, p. 675.
An excellent recent reference for such problems is, Hawking and Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge, 1973.
Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, 1973, Chapter 44, pp. 1197–98. I wish to thank Prof. Wheeler for most kindly giving me a preprint copy of Chapter 44 before its appearance in print.
J. A. Wheeler, ‘From Mendeleev’s Atom to the Collapsing Star’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XI (ed. by R. J. Seeger and R. S. Cohen), Dordrecht and Boston, 1974.
B. De Witt, ‘The Many-Universe Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in B. d’Espagnat (ed.), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
This has been reprinted, with a number of other fundamental papers on the subject in B. DeWitt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973.
Ibid.>, p. 212.
Ibid.>, p. 214.
Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, 1973, Chapter 44, pp. 1203–1205.
Ibid.>, Chapter 44, p. 1206
D. van Dantzig, ‘On the Relation Between Geometry and Physics and the Concept of Space-Time’, in Helvetica Physica Acta, Supplement IV, p. 48.
J. A. Wheeler, ‘From Relativity to Mutability’, in J. Mehra (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht and Boston, 1973, pp. 233–34.
Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, 1973, Chapter 44, p. 1208.
Ibid.>, Chapter 44, p. 1212.
J. A. Wheeler, see note 16, p. 244.
D. van Dantzig, ibid.>
J. Stachel, ‘A Note on Scientific Practice’, to appear in For Dirk Struik (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XV, 1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stachel, J. (1974). The Rise and Fall of Geometrodynamics. In: Schaffner, K.F., Cohen, R.S. (eds) PSA 1972. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2140-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2140-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0409-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2140-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive