Skip to main content

The Affirmation of Divine Passibility: Its Compatibility with the Major Doctrines of the Christian Faith

  • Chapter
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of our critical examination of the validity of the basic assumptions for the doctrine of divine impassibility and some of the serious objections against the assertion of divine passibility in the light of divine empathy, we have concluded that the traditional idea of divine impassibility is largely based on a metaphysical notion of deity rather than the biblical idea of God. Therefore, we have rejected the impassibility of God as a sound doctrine of the Christian faith.

Keywords

  • Christian Faith
  • Human Spirit
  • Natural Evil
  • Essential Meaning
  • Integral Reality

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

eBook
EUR   6.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   54.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham J. Heschel, The Prophets (New York: Harper and Row, 19627, p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leslie D. Weatherhead, Why Do Men Suffer? New York: The Abingdon Press, 1936), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert C. Dentan, The King and His Cross ( New York: Seabury Press, 1965 ), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand R. Brasnett, The Suffering of the Impassible God ( London: S. P. C. K., 1928 ), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. K. Mozley, The Impassibility of God: A Survey of Christian Thought ( Cambridge: University Press, 1926 ), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allan D. Galloway, The Cosmis Christ ( New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951 ), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolas Berdyaev, The Destiny of Man ( New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960 ), pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edgar S. Brightman, A Philosophy of Religion (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1940), p. 336 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Maurice Relton, Studies in Christian Doctrine ( London: The Macmillan Company, 1960 ), pp. 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Wheeler Robinson, Suffering, Human and Divine ( New York: The Macmillan Company, 1939 ), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolas Berdyaev, The Divine and Human ( London: Geoffrey Bless, 1949 ), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Barth, Credo ( New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1962 ), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfhart Pannenberg, Jesus - God and Man, trans, by L. L. Wilkins and D. A. Priebe (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1968), p. 334 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Donald M. Baillie, God Was in Christ ( New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1948 ), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karl Barth, The Humanity of God ( Richmond: John Knox Press, 1960 ), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bertrand R. Brasnett, The Suffering of the Impassible God ( London: S. P. C. K., 1928 ), pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gustaf Aulén, The Faith of the Christian Church, trans, by Eric H. Wahlstrom and G. Everett Arden (Philadelphia: The Muhlenberg Press, 1948 ), p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bernard M. Loomer,“Christian Faith and Process Philosophy,” in Process Philosophy and Christian Thought, edited bu Delwin Brown, etal. ( New York: The Bobbs-Merrill, 1971 ), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Maurice Relton, A Study in Christology: The Problem of the Relation of the Two Natures in the Person of Christ (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1931), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Maurice Relton, Studies in Christian Doctrine ( London: The Macmillan Company, 1960 ), p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Origen, “Homilies in Ezechielem,” The Early Christian Fathers: A Selection from the Writings of the Fathers from St. Clement of Rome to St. Athanasius, edited by Henry Bettenson ( London, Oxford University Press, 1956 ), p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harold Knight, The Hebrew Prophetic Consciousness ( London: Lutterworth Press, 1947 ), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Francis J. McConnel, Is God Limited? (London: Williams and Norgate, 1924), p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. T. Forsyth, The Person and Plate of Jesus Christ ( London: Independent Press, 1909 ), p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  25. John Baillie, The Place of Jesus Christ in Modern Christianity ( New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929 ), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship, trans, by R. H. Fuller (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1959 ), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Edgar S. Brightman, Is God a Person? ( New York: Association Press, 1932 ), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gustaf Aulen, Christus Victor: An Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of the Atonement ( London: S. P. C. K., 1931 ), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hendrikus Berkhof, The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit: The Annie Kinkead Warfield Lectures, 1963–1964 ( Richmond: John Knox Press, 1964 ), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harold J. Ockenga, The Spirit of the Living God ( London: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1947 ), p. 16

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Wheeler Robinson, The Christian Experience of the Holy Spirit ( New York: Harper and Brothers, 1928 ), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Robert Nelson, The Realm of Redemption: Studies in the Doctrine of the Nature of the Church in Contemporary Protestant Theology ( London: The Epworth Press, 1951 ), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Communion of Saints: A Dogmatic Inquiry into the Sociology of the Church ( New York: Harper and Row, 1963 ), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bonhoeffer, The Communion of Saints, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cyril C. Richardson, The Doctrine of the Trinity (New York: The Abingdon Press, 1958), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barth, Credo ( New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1962 ), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Relton, Studies in Christian Doctrine, pp. 45, 46, 179.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kenneth J. Foreman, Identification: Human and Divine ( Richmond: John Knox Press, 1963 ), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Edgar S. Brightman, The Problem of God ( New York: The Abingdon Press, 1930 ), p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Robinson,Suffering, Human and Divine, p. 184; originally quoted from H. R. Mackintosh, Some Aspects of Christian Belief, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  41. William J. Wolf, No Cross, No Crown: A Study of the Atonement ( New York: Doubleday, 1957 ), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J.Y. (1974). The Affirmation of Divine Passibility: Its Compatibility with the Major Doctrines of the Christian Faith. In: God Suffers for Us. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2048-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2048-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1614-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2048-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive