Abstract
When we speak of a pronoun as looking back or referring back to its antecedent we are using terms of traditional grammar: so I begin with some methodological remarks on the use of such terms. It is a fallacy — one that I have called, from its best known perpetrator, the Socratic fallacy — to infer a lack of understanding of such terms from the absence of a rigorous formal definition of them. A common understanding of terms may be achieved, and in some cases must be achieved, by other means than formal definition. People who have received a certain sort of high- school education will mostly agree about the parsing of an English sentence, with the use of grammatical terms like these; it is only this sort of common understanding of familiar grammatical terms — including the ones italicized in my first sentence — that I am assuming. It is a merely extensional common understanding: people will mostly agree in picking out examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geach, P.T. (1976). Back-Reference. In: Kasher, A. (eds) Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0645-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1876-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive