How Empirical is Contemporary Logical Empiricism?
One of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel’s most admirable virtues was his ability to discern, and readiness to remark on, the nakedness of a naked emperor even when he himself had previously been one of the crowd that thought the emperor decently clad. My tribute to him will take the form of an attempt at an exercise of just this kind. If my own present venture into the genre is unsuccessful, I shall at least have given due credit for his successes to Yehoshua.
KeywordsInductive Logic Ordinary Language Philosophical Theory Intuitive Idea Intuitive Judgment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R. Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul. London, 1937, p. 334ff. Cf. also pp. 230–1.Google Scholar
- 2.C. G. Hempel, ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmation’, Mind 54 (1945), 9 (reprinted in: C. G. Hempel Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press and Collier-Mac-Millan, New York and London, 1965, p. 9 ).Google Scholar
- 3.C. G. Hempel and P. Oppenheim, ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15 (1948), 161 (reprinted in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, p. 275).Google Scholar
- 4.J. G. Kemeny, ‘Carnap’s Theory of Probability and Induction’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1963, p. 713.Google Scholar
- 5.I. SchefSer, ‘Prospects of a Modest Empiricism’, Review of Metaphysics 10 (1957), 625.Google Scholar