Abstract
I would like to distinguish roughly between two kinds of issues that arise in the study of language and mind: those that appear to be within the reach of approaches and concepts that are moderately well understood — what I will call “problems”; and others that remain as obscure to us today as when they were originally formulated — what I will call “mysteries.” The distinction reflects in part a subjective evaluation of what has been achieved or might be achieved in terms of ideas now available. Others see mysteries, incoherence and confusion where to me the issues seem rather clear and straightforward, and conversely.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Alston, William P., 1963, ‘Meaning and use’, Philosophical Quarterly 13, 107–124.
Anderson, Stephen R. and Kiparsky, Paul, (eds.), 1973, A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Austin, John L., 1940, ‘The Meaning of a Word’, published in Urmson and Warnock (eds.), (1961).
Barnes, Jonathan, 1972, ‘Mr. Locke’s Darling Notion’, Philosophical Quarterly 22, 22,193–214.
Beloff, John, 1973, Psychological Sciences: a Review of Modern Psychology, Harper and Row, New York.
Bresnan, Joan W., 1973, ‘Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations,’ in Hintikka, Moravcsik and Suppes (eds.), (1973).
Brewer, William F., forthcoming, ‘There is no convincing Evidence for Operant or Classical Conditioning in Adult Humans’, in Weimer and Palermo (eds.), (forth-coming).
Chomsky, Noam, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge.
Chomsky, Noam, 1966, Cartesian Linguistics, Harper and Row, New York.
Chomsky, Noam, 1968a, ‘Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate Ideas’, in Cohen and Wartofsky (eds.), (1968).
Chomsky, Noam, 1968b, Language and Mind, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, New York.
Chomsky, Noam, 1969a, ‘Quine’s Empirical Assumptions’, in Davidson and Hintikka (eds.), (1969). Excerpted from ‘Some Empirical Assumptions in Modern Philosophy of Language’, in Morgenbesser, Suppes and White (eds.), ( 1969 ).
Chomsky, Noam, 1969b, ‘Linguistics and Philosophy’, in Hook (ed.) (1969).
Chomsky, Noam, 1970, ‘Language and Freedom’, Abraxas, 1, No. 1; reprinted in Chomsky, For Reasons of State, Pantheon, New York (1973).
Chomsky, Noam, 1971, Problems of Knowledge and Freedom, Pantheon, New York.
Chomsky, Noam, 1972, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague.
Chomsky, Noam, 1973, ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Anderson and Kiparsky (eds.), (1973).
Chomsky, Noam, 1974a, ‘Knowledge of Language’, in Gunderson and Maxwell (eds.), (1974).
Chomsky, Noam, 1974b, ‘Dialogue with Noam Chomsky,’ in Parret (ed.), (1974).
Chomsky, Noam, forthcoming, Reflections on Language, Pantheon.
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris, 1968, Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris, and Lukoff, Fred, 1956, ‘On Accent and Juncture in English’, in Halle, Lunt and MacLean (eds.), (1956).
Chomsky, Noam, and Katz, Jerrold J., 1974, ‘What the Linguist is Talking About’, Journal of Philosophy 71, 347–367.
Chomsky, Noam and Katz, Jerrold, J., 1975, ‘On Innateness: A Reply to Cooper’, Philosophical Review 84, 70–87.
Cohen, L. Jonathan, 1966, The Diversity of Meaning, Methuen, London, second edition.
Cohen, L. Jonathan, 1970, ‘Some Applications of Inductive Logic to the Theory of Language’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 299–310.
Cohen, Robert S. and Wartofsky, Marx W. (eds.), 1968, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. Ill, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Cooper, David E., 1972, ‘Innateness: Old and New’, Philosophical Review 81, 465–483.
Davidson, Donald, and Hintikka, Jaakko, (eds.), 1969: Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Dougherty, Ray C, 1968, ‘A Transformational Grammar of Coordinate Conjoined Structures’, Ph. D. Dissertation, M.I.T.
Dougherty, Ray C., 1970, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjunction, I’, Language 46, 850–98.
Dougherty, Ray C., 1971, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjunction, II’, Language 47, 298–339.
Dougherty, Ray C., 1974, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of each other Constructions’, Foundations of Language 12, 1–47.
Estes, William K., 1972, ‘Reinforcement in Human Behavior,’ American Scientist 60, 723–729.
Fiengo, Robert and Lasnik, Howard, 1973, ‘The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English’, Foundations of Language 9 447–68.
Gewirth, Alan, 1973, ‘The Sleeping Chess Player’, Letter, New York Review of Books, 20 (Feb. 22,1973), 38.
Glass, Andrea Velletri, Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Premack, David, 1973, ‘Artificial Language Training in Global Aphasics’, Neuropsychologia 11, 95–104.
Goodman, Nelson, 1951, The Structure of Appearance, Harvard, Cambridge.
Goodman, Nelson, 1969, ‘The Emperor’s New Ideas’, in Hook (ed.), (1969).
Graves, Christina, Katz, Jerrold J., et ah, 1973, ‘Tacit Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 70 (7 June 1973), 318–30.
Greenfield, Patricia Marks, Nelson, Karen, and Saltzman, Elliott, 1972, ‘The Development of Rulebound Strategies for Manipulating Seriated Cups: A Parallel between Action and Grammar’, Cognitive Psychology 3, 291–310.
Gunderson, Keith and Maxwell, Grover, (eds.), 1974, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. VI.
Haldane, Elizabeth S. and Ross, G. R. T., (translators), 1955, The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Dover, Vol. I.
Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace, and MacLean, Hugh, (eds.), 1956, For Roman Jakobson, Mouton, The Hague.
Harman, Gilbert and Davidson, Donald (eds.) 1972, Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hintikka, K. J. J., Moravcsik, J. M. E., and Suppes, P. (eds.), 1973, Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hiz, Henry, 1973, ‘On the Rules of Consequence for a Natural Language’, The Monist 57, 312–27.
Hook, Sidney, (ed.) 1969, Language and Philosophy, N.Y.U., New York.
Jackendoff, Ray, S., 1969: ‘Some rules of semantic interpretation in English,’ Ph. D. Dissertation, M.I.T..
Jackendoff, Ray S., 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge.
John, E. Roy, 1972, ‘Switchboard versus Statistical Theories of Learning and Memory’, Science 177 (Sept. 8, 1972), 850–864.
Luce, R. Duncan, Bush, Robert R., and Galanter, Eugene (eds.), 1963, Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. II, Wiley, New York.
Miller, George A. and Chomsky, Noam, 1963, ‘Finitary Models of Language Users’, in Luce, Bush, Galanter (eds.), (1963), vol. I I.
Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton, (eds.), 1969, Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Nottebohm, F., 1970, ‘Ontogeny of Bird Song: Different Strategies in Vocal Development Are Reflected in Learning Stages, Critical Periods, and Neural Lateralization’, Science 167, 950–56.
Parret, Herman (ed.) 1974, Discussing Language, Mouton, The Hague.
Peters, Stanley, 1972: The Projection Problem: How is a Grammar to be Selected?’, in S. Peters (ed.) (1972).
Peters, Stanley, (ed.) 1972, Goals of Linguistic Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Pylyshyn, Zenon W., 1973, ‘The Role of Competence Theories in Cognitive Psychology’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 21–50.
Quine, W. V., 1953, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V., 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V., 1968, ‘The Inscrutability of Reference’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 185–212.
Quine, W. V., 1969a, ‘Reply to Chomsky’, in Davidson and Hintikka (eds.), (1969).
Quine, W. V., 1969b, ‘Linguistics and Philosophy’, in Hook (ed.), (1969).
Quine, W. V., 1972, ‘Methodological Reflections on Current Linguistic Theory’, in Harman and Davidson (eds.), (1972).
Quine, W. V., 1974, The Roots of Reference, Open Court, La Salle.
Reber, Arthur S., 1973, ‘On Psycho-Linguistic Paradigms’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 289–320.
Schwartz, Robert, 1969, ‘On Knowing a Grammar’, in Hook (ed.), (1969).
Searle, John, 1972, ‘Chomsky’s Revolution in Linguistics’, New York Review of Books 18 (June 29, 1972), 16–24.
Searle, John, 1973, ‘Reply to Gewirth’, New York Review of Books 20 (Feb. 22, 1973), 38.
Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.) 1902, Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals by David Hume, second edition, Oxford (1902).
Suppes, Patrick, 1969, ‘Stimulus–response theory of Finite Automata’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6, 327–355.
Suppes, Patrick, 1973, ‘Semantics of Natural Languages’, in Hintikka, Moravcsik and Suppes (eds.), (1973).
Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J. (eds,), 1967, J. L. Austin: Philosophical Papers, Oxford.
Vendler, Z., 1972, Res Cogitans, Cornell, Ithaca.
Weimer, W. B. and Palermo, D. S. (eds.), forthcoming, Cognition and Symbolic Processes
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Noam Chomsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chomsky, N. (1976). Problems and Mysteries in the Study of Human Language. In: Kasher, A. (eds) Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0645-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1876-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive