Advertisement

Towards an Integrated Theory of Grammatical and Pragmatical Meaning

  • Dieter Wunderlich
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 43)

Abstract

I shall sharply distinguish between utterance acts and speech acts: an utterance act is considered simply as the physical activity of a person which produces phonic or graphic events, whereas a speech act is considered an interpretation of such an activity relative to a particular language system, a particular action system, and the social situation in which utterer and perceiver are involved.

Keywords

Interaction Condition Individual Attitude Deontic Logic Position Type Action Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Austin, J. L., 1962, How to do Things with Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Grice, H. P., 1968, Logic and Conversation, lectures; published in part in D. Davidson and G. Harman, (eds.), The Logic of Grammar, Dickenson, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Grice, H. P., 1969, ‘Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions’, Philosophical Review 78, 147– 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kasher, A., 1971, ‘A Step Toward a Theory of Linguistic Performance’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Languages, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lewis, D. K., 1969, Convention, Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. K., 1971, ‘General Semantics’, in D. Davidson, and G. Harman (eds.) Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972, pp. 164–218.Google Scholar
  7. Searle, J. S., 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Searle, J. S., 1973, ’A Classification of Illocutionary Acts’, Unpublished paper, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Stenius, E., 1967, ‘Mood and Language-Game’, reprinted in Stenius, E. Critical Essays, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1972, pp. 182–202.Google Scholar
  10. von Wright, G. H., 1970, ‘Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions’, in R. Hilpinen, (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 159–177.Google Scholar
  11. Wunderlich, D., 1972, ‘Zur Konventionalität von Sprechhandlungen; in D. Wunderlich (ed.), Linguistische Pragmatik, Frankfurt/M. pp. 11–58.Google Scholar
  12. Wunderlich, D., 1974, Grundlagen der Linguistik, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Wunderlich
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität DüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations