Advertisement

Kurtosis and Departure from Normality

  • C. C. Heyde
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (ASIC, volume 17)

Summary

The coefficients of skewness and kurtosis are traditional measures of departure from normality which have been widely used, particularly in an empirical context. Theoretical disadvantages of the quantities have been often mentioned in the literature; these are here emphasized by an example of a family of non-symmetric distributions, all of whose odd order moments vanish, which have the same moments, the first four coinciding with those of the unit normal law. Nevertheless, if one restricts the class of distributions under consideration to a class L 2 of mixtures of normals, then the kurtosis appears as a distance in a metric space setting Keilson and Steutel (1974)]. It is shown here that, in this metric space setting, the kurtosis can also be used in a bound on both the uniform metric for the distance between a distribution function and the unit normal distribution function and a non-uniform bound. A similar, and simpler, bound is also given in the case of more general mixtures.

Key Words

Departure from normality distance between distribution functions bounds on uniform metric mixtures of distributions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Feller, W. (1966). An Introduction to Probability Theory and. Its Applications, Vol. II. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fisher, R. A. (1958). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 13th ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gnedenko, B. V. and Kolmogorov, A. N. (1954). Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables. Addison- Wesley, Cambridge, Mass.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Heyde, C. C. (1963). Quart. J. Math. Oxford 14, 97–105.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Heyde, C. C. and Seneta, E. (1972). Biometrika 59, 680–683.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Keilson, J. and Steutel, F. W. (1974). Ann. Probab. 2, 112–130.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1958). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1961). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1966). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 3. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Petrov, V. V. (1972). Sums of Independent Random Variables. Izdat. Mauka, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Tsaregradskii, I. P. (1958). Theor. Probab. Appi. 3 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wald, A. (1939). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 46, 280–306.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Zolotarev, V. M. (1965). Theor. Probab. Appi. 10, 472–479.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zolotarev, V. M. (1967). Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb 8, 332–342.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. C. Heyde
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations