Abstract
If the problem of induction were soluble, it should be solved inductively: by observing how scientists observe, etc. The fact is that scientific research is successful, and the real question is, will it be so in future? If there is a formula of induction by which success is achieved, then by this formula we can say, as long as it will be used science will succeed. If there is no formula it looks as if future success in scientific research is most doubtful. Hence, a transcendental argument for induction goes, there is an inductive formula. Since, however, such a view of induction is rejected even by inductivists as naive, the argument collapses. Hence the question is, on what basis do we project the future success of science? My answer is that this future success is built into our social institutions and is partially institutionally safeguarded.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (1975). Positive Evidence in Science and Technology. In: Science in Flux. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1810-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1810-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0612-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1810-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive