Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metaphysical Method in General

  • Chapter
Hegel’s Dialectic

Part of the book series: Sovietica ((SOVA,volume 33))

  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

In the first chapter of this part it has been shown that Hegel by no means denies the scientific character of metaphysical problems. Aside from his use of the term in the positive sense, however, Hegel also frequently uses ‘metaphysics’ in a critical sense, as designating an out-dated method of obtaining knowledge about the absolute.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lo. I 109; En. §§26ff.; Re. II-II 87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lo. I 25; cf. also Lo. I 12, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Gesc. IV.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hegel’s discussions of medieval philosophy are almost exclusively based on secondary sources.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phä. 163

    Google Scholar 

  6. En. §27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lo. II 408. Cf. also our Part III, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. En. §60, note; Lo. II 434f.

    Google Scholar 

  9. GLu.. 92f.

    Google Scholar 

  10. En. §28: “superior to the later Critical philosophizing.”

    Google Scholar 

  11. En. §§49f.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lo I 4; Rel. I-I 208.

    Google Scholar 

  13. En §36, note

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phä. 23. Cf. also Re. II-I 23, note.

    Google Scholar 

  15. En §30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Phä. 35f.

    Google Scholar 

  17. En. §32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.r.. (Preface B, p. xxx); K.r.. A 430;Kr.. A 763f.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lo. I 109.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lo. I 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Re. I-II 43.

    Google Scholar 

  22. En. §36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lo. I 128.

    Google Scholar 

  24. On the impossibility of a dualistic interpretation of Hegel as regards the relationship of the logical idea to nature, cf. Kruithof 271ff.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lo. II 357.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lo. II 355.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Be. 85f.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andries Sarlemijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarlemijn, A. (1975). Metaphysical Method in General. In: Hegel’s Dialectic. Sovietica, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1736-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1736-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1738-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1736-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation