Abstract
I feel that I must begin by confessing a prejudice. I find it difficult to take seriously commentators who ascribe a fixed or final position to Nietzsche. By this time Nietzsche scholarship has brought us safely beyond the crudest mis-identifications: Darwinian Eugenicist, Racist, Proto-Nazi, etc. But subtler ones persist. It is still generally supposed that one must identify Nietzsche with such doctrines as the Will to Power, the Übermensch, and the Eternal Recurrence in much the same way The Forms have been identified with Plato and the Categorical Imperative with Kant. I see no way of refuting such notions in one stroke short of reproducing the entire Nietzschean corpus—accurately translated and with careful textual exegeses wherever needed—in such a way that its impact can be felt in one synoptic overview. This being impractical, we shall have to settle for something less.
“I leave a white and turbid wake; pale waters, paler cheeks, where’er I sail. The envious billows sidelong swell to whelm my tracks; let them; but first I pass.” Moby Dick, “The Sunset”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuss, P. (1975). Some Perplexities in Nietzsche. In: Ihde, D., Zaner, R.M. (eds) Dialogues in Phenomenology. Selected Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1615-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1615-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1665-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1615-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive