Advertisement

A Pattern Stimulus for Optimal Response from the Retina

  • C. Barber
  • N. R. Galloway
Part of the Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series book series (DOPS, volume 10)

Abstract

The importance of edges and sharp intensity contours in visual stimuli has led to great popularity for the checkerboard pattern stimulus since SPEHL-MAN (1965) reported a bigger response from a flashed checkerboard pattern than from a plain flash. Other patterns have been compared with it but is generally acknowledged to be the most effective type of stimulus for producing a large evoked response (White, 1969; Van Der Tweel & Spek-Reijse 1973). In clinical applications, and particularly where threshold detection may be involved, this is clearly an advantage.

Keywords

Stimulus Pattern Checkerboard Pattern Check Size Normal Visual Field Luminance Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cigánek, L. Binoculor addition of the visual response evoked by dichoptic patterned stimuli. Vision Res. 11, 1289–1297 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eason, R.G., White, C.T. & Bartlett, N. Effects of checkerboard pattern stimulations on evoked cortical responses in relation to check size and visual field. Psychon. Sci, 21, 113–115 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. Harter, M.R. Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check size as a function of retinal eccentricity. Vision Res., 10, 1365–1376 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harter, M.R. & Suitt, CD. Visually evoked cortical responses and pattern vision in the infant: a longitudinal study. Psychon. Sci., 18, 235–237 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Harter, M.R. & White, C.T. Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check size as a function of visual acuity. Electroenceph. Clin. Neuro-physiol, 28, 48–54 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeffreys, D.A. Cortical source locations of pattern-related visual evoked potentials recorded from the human scalp. Nature, 229, 502–504 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael, W.F. & Halliday, A.M. Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man. Brain Res., 32, 311–324 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Regan, D. In: Evoked potentials in psychology, sensory physiology and clinical medicine. Chapman and Hall, London. (1972).Google Scholar
  9. Rietveld, W.J., Tordoir, W.E.M., Hagenouw, J.R.B., Lubbers, J.A. & Spoor, Th. A.C. Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerl., 14, 259–285 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Spehlman, R. The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol 19, 560–569 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Spekreijse, H., Van Der Tweel, L.H. & Zuidema, Th. Contrast evoked responses in man. Vision Res., 13, 1577-1501.Google Scholar
  12. Van Der Tweel, L.H. & Spekreijse, H. Psychophysics and electro-physiology of a evoked by changes in spatial brightness contrast. Proc. 7th. Int. Symp. Iscerg, Instanbul 1-12 (1969).Google Scholar
  13. Van Der Tweel, L.H. & Spekreijse, H. Psychophysics and electro-physiology of a rod-achromat. Proc 10th Int. Symp. Iscerg, Los Angeles, 163-174 (1972).Google Scholar
  14. White, C.T. Evoked cortical responses and patterned stimuli. Am. Psychol., 24, 212–214 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Barber
    • 1
  • N. R. Galloway
    • 1
  1. 1.NottinghamEngland

Personalised recommendations