The IQ Controversy and the Philosophy of Education
Although my two colleagues on this panel are bonafide philosophers who clearly have a bonafide interest in the ongoing controversy over IQ and the educability of children (which should mean that the topic requires no further defense), I nonetheless feel constrained to say a word in defense of our topic as a viable subject for discussion in a forum devoted to the Philosophy of Science. Perhaps this is because, as the representative of the discipline which created this mess, I fear you might associate me with it. You might feel that bad science is a bad subject for study by philosophers of science, and furthermore that anyone associated with such a discipline would be the last person to have anything intelligent to say about philosophy.
KeywordsGene Pool Achievement Test School Achievement Heritability Study Pure Conception
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Eells, K., Davis, A., Havighurst, R., Herrick, R., and Cronbach, L.: 1951, Intelligence and Cultural Differences; a Study of Cultural Learning and Problem-Solving, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Findley, W. G. and Bryan, M. M.: 1970, Ability Grouping: 1970, University of Georgia, Atlanta.Google Scholar
- Jencks, C, Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., and Michelson, S.: 1972, Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Jensen, A. R.: 1972, Genetics and Education, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar