Abstract
There is a disagreement between Kenneth Schaffner and David Hull about the relationship between the biological theory of Mendelian genetics and the physico-chemical theory of molecular genetics.1 Schaffner believes that the logical-empiricist thesis about theory-reduction is, in important respects, applicable to this relationship and illuminating when so applied. Hull denies its applicability and its illumination — indeed, he has gone as far as to say that “ I find the logical empiricist analysis of reduction inadequate at best, wrong-headed at worst.” (Hull, 1974a, 12) and he adds that “ the conclusion seems inescapable that the logical empiricist analysis of reduction is not very instructive in the case of genetics. For my own part, I found that it hindered rather than facilitated understanding the relationship between Mendelian and molecular genetics.” (Hull, 1974a, 44)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Burns, G. W.: 1972, The Science of Genetics, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York.
Dobzhansky, Th.: 1951, Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. 1951, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dobzhansky, Th.: 1970, Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia, New York.
Hull, D. L.: 1972, ‘Reduction in Genetics — Biology or Philosophy?’, Phil. Sci. 39, 491–99.
Hull, D. L.: 1973, ‘Reduction in Genetics — Doing the Impossible’, in P. Suppes et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, 619–35.
Hull, D. L.: 1974a, Philosophy of Biological Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Hull, D. L.: 1974b, ‘Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction’. Read at P.S.A. conference 1974.
Lewontin, R. C: 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.
Locke, J.: 1959, A. C. Fraser (ed.), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Dover, New York.
Luzzatto, L., Nwachuku-Jarrett, E. S., and Reddy, S.: 1970, ‘Increased Sickling of Parasitised Erythrocytes as Mechanism of Resistance Against Malaria in the Sickle-Cell Trait’, Lancet I, 319–22.
Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Ruse, M.: 1971, ‘Reduction, Replacement, and Molecular Biology’, Dialectica 25, 39–72.
Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson University Library, London.
Schaffner, K. F.: 1967, ‘Approaches to Reduction’, Phil. Sci. 34, 137–47.
Schaffner, K. F.: 1969, ‘The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 20, 325–48.
Schaffner, K. F.: 1974a, ‘The Peripherality of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Biology’, J. Hist. Biol. 7, 111–39.
Schaffner, K. F.: 1974b, ‘Reductionism in Biology: Prospects and Problems’, Read at P.S.A. conference 1974.
Strickberger, M. W.: 1968, Genetics, Macmillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruse, M. (1976). Reduction in Genetics. In: Cohen, R.S., Hooker, C.A., Michalos, A.C., Van Evra, J.W. (eds) PSA 1974. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0648-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1449-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive