Advertisement

PSA 1974 pp 393-422 | Cite as

Two Forms of Determinism

  • Peter Kirschenmann
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 32)

Abstract

Philosophers are continually challenged to comprehend chance phenomena and probabilistic relationships. Those cases are especially intriguing in which we speak of chance or probability but can hardly attribute this manner of speaking to our being partially or totally ignorant of the situations in question. Those cases, then, can be taken to possess chance as an objective feature. In its intent, this paper is restricted to a discussion of such cases. Among objective chance relationships there is one kind which seems especially incomprehensible. These are stochastic relationships, i.e., chance relationships between consecutive states of physical systems. The existence of such relationships offends the common conviction that the temporal evolution or succession of states in physical systems is fully deterministic.

Keywords

State Space Stochastic System Stochastic Theory Admissible State Subsequent State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bub, J.: 1973, ‘On the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
  2. Bunge, M.: 1951, ‘What is Chance?’, Science and Society 15, 209–231.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M.: 1967, Foundations of Physics, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bunge, M.: 1970, ‘Problems Concerning Intertheory Relations’, in P. Weingartner and G. Zecha (eds.), Induction, Physics, and Ethics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 285–325.Google Scholar
  5. Cahn, S. M.: 1967, ‘Chance’, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, 1967, Vol. 2, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
  6. Feller, W.: 1966, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Feller, W.: 1968, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I, 3rd ed., John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Fraassen, B. C. van: 1972, ‘A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Paradigm and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1972, pp. 303–366.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, N.: 1966, The Structure of Appearance, 2nd ed., Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  10. Hawkins, D.: 1964, The Language of Nature, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Heisenberg, W.: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hölling, J.: 1971, ‘Zur Kategorialanalyse des physikalischen Feldbegriffs’, in J. Hölling, Realismus und Relativität, W. Fink, Munich, 1971, pp. 126–139. First published in Philosophia Naturalis 10 (1968), 343-356.Google Scholar
  13. Hooker, C. A.: 1973, ‘Metaphysics and Modern Physics’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 174–304.Google Scholar
  14. Kirschenmann, P.: 1972, ‘Concepts of Randomness’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landé, A.: 1973, Quantum Mechanics in a New Key, Exposition Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Mackey, G. W.: 1963, The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Mellor, D. H.: 1971, The Matter of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Neumann, J. von: 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  20. Newton, I.: 1952, Opticks, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Poincaré, H.: 1912, Calcul des probabilités, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Prabhu, N. U.: 1965, Stochastic Processes, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Schlesinger, G.: 1975, ‘The Similarities Between Space and Time’, Mind 84, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suppes, P.: 1957, Introduction to Logic, D. van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, R.: 1955, ‘Spatial and Temporal Analogies and the Concept of Identity’, Journal of Philosophy 52, 599–612. Repr. in J. J. C. Smart (ed.), Problems of Space and Time, Macmillan, New York, 1964, pp. 381-396.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, R.: 1963, Metaphysics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  27. Watanabe, S.: 1966, ‘Time and the Probabilistic View of the World’, in J. T. Fraser (ed.), The Voices of Time, G. Braziller, New York, 1966, pp. 527, 563.Google Scholar
  28. Weisskopf, V. F.: 1972, Physics in the Twentieth Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Wigner, E. P.: 1973, ‘Epistemological Perspective on Quantum Theory’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, 369–385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Kirschenmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Clarkson College of TechnologyPotsdamUSA

Personalised recommendations