Advertisement

Ingardeniana pp 241-418 | Cite as

Beyond Ingarden’s Idealism/Realism Controversy with Husserl — The New Contextual Phase of Phenomenology

  • Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 4)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Cf. by the present writer: ‘The second Phenomenology’, in: For Roman Ingarden: Nine Essays in Phenomenology, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, Nijhoff, 1960, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Cf. by the present writer: ‘Roman Ingarden ou la position du probleme IdealismeRealisme’, Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Philosophy, Brussels, and: ’The Controversy about the Existence of the World’, book review in Mind, 1957.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Cf. the present writer’s: Essence et Existence, étude à propos de la philosophie de Roman Ingarden et Nicolai Hartmann, Aubier, 1957 (later referred to as: Essence et Existence), Chap. IX and X, pp. 96–106.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Cf. the present writer’s: Phenomenology and Science in Contemporary European Thought, Farrar, Strauss and Cudahy, New York, 1961; Part I. Chap. on Ingarden’s analysis of the literary work of art; also ‘Studies in Aesthetics’, review of Ingarden’s 3 volumes of aesthetics in Journal for Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1958.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Cf. Spór, vol. II, pp. 293–297. This conception is also present in Das Litterarische Kunstwerk. Eine Untersuchung aus dem Grenzgebiet der Ontologie, Logik and Literaturwissenschaft, 2. verbesserte and erweiterte Auflage. 1931, Max Niemeyer; Anhang: ‘Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel’. Max Niemeyer, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Cf. by the present writer: ‘Eidos, Idea and Participation’, Kantstudien, Bd. 52, Heft 1, 1960/61.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Cf. Nicolai Hartmann, Der Aufbau des realen Seins, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1938.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Cf. E. Souriau, Les Différents modes d’existence, Paris, P.U.F., 1945.Google Scholar
  9. 21a.
    Cf. Roman Ingarden, ‘Les modes d’existence et le problème idéalisme-réalisme’, Library of the Xth International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam 1948.Google Scholar
  10. 29.
    Roman Ingarden, Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. II/2, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1965, p. 97.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    Der Streit, vol. II/I — Spór, vol. I, § 46; also ’Die Vier Begriffe der Transzendenz und das Problem des Idealismus in Husserl,’ Analecta Husserliana, vol. I, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 61.
    The prequoted Das Literarische Kunstwerk and O poznawaniu Dziela Literackiego (O poznawaniu), 2nd ed. in Studia z Estetyki, vol. I, 1957 (also in German: Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, 3 vol. edition, Niemeyer, 1963).Google Scholar
  13. 63.
    Cf. P. Leon, ‘Critical note on Ingarden’s Das Literarische Kunstwerk’, Mind, vol. XLL, 193; also by the present writer: Phenomenology and Science in Contemporary European Thought, Part I.Google Scholar
  14. 65.
    Roman Ingarden, ‘Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object’, in Journal for Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 2, 1960–1961.Google Scholar
  15. 83.
    Roman Ingarden, O budowie obrazu, 1st ed., PAN 1946, p. 56.Google Scholar
  16. 90.
    Über die Kausale Struktur der realen Welt, Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Bd. III, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen 1974.Google Scholar
  17. 103.
    Ksiaìeczka o czlowieku Wyd. Literackie, 2 wyd. 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 104.
    Roman Ingarden: Über die Verantwortung, Ihre ontische Fundamente, Reclam, Stuttgart, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. 123.
    Cf. by the present writer: Why is there Something rather than Nothing? Prolegomena to the phenomenology of Cosmic Creation, Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, 1965.Google Scholar
  20. 127a.
    Cf. the present writer: ’Dem Wendepunkt der Phänomenologie entgegen’, Philosophische Rundschau, Heidelberg, 1967.Google Scholar
  21. 128.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Autrement qu’être, Au délà des essences, Phaenomenologica, Nijhoff 1974Google Scholar
  22. 128a.
    Ed. M. Fleischer, 1973, Nijhoff 1966, p. 101–102.Google Scholar
  23. 129.
    Cf. Strasser, ‘Grundgedanken der Sozialontologie Edmund Husserls’, in Zeitschrift far Philosophische Forschung, Bd. 29, Heft I, 1975 p. 14, 17.Google Scholar
  24. 131.
    J. N. Mohanty, Edmund Husserl’s Theory of meaning, Nijhoff, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. 132.
    Paul Ricoeur, ‘Phénoménologie et Hermeneutique’, Phänomenologische Studien, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. 134.
    The present writer has first introduced into phenomenological inquiry the conception of the ‘contextual framework’ of analysis in her book: Leibniz’ Cosmological Synthesis, Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. 137.
    For ‘phenomenological techniques’ Ibid., and also by the present writer: ’Conjectural inference and phenomenological analysis’ in Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bochehski, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. 139.
    By the present writer: ‘Cosmos, Nature and Man and the Foundations of Psychiatry’, in Heidegger and the Path of Thinking, Duquesne University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. 147.
    Cf. the previously quoted: ‘Conjectural inference and phenomenological analysis’.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations