Abstract
One task of philosophy is to re-examine itself with respect to its goals, methods, and fields of inquiry. Its foundations must be re-evaluated continuously. This article will undertake the task of re-examining Process Philosophy and of outlining one of the basic decisions with which it must be concerned. Is the processive character of reality directly given to the philosopher as his ultimate datum or does Process Philosophy structure reality according to the characteristics of a creative becoming? This article will focus primarily upon the metaphysical issues involved in this question and will postpone the fundamental epistemological questions. Process philosophers must confront this question and either accept one perspective or the other or else they must show how both perspectives are identical or can be synthesized. It will be helpful to utilize the Fragments of Heraclitus as a background for confronting this question. It would be a gross over-simplification and over-interpretation of Process Philosophy and of Heraclitus if one imagined that the former is a return of Heraclitus in twentieth century garb.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Heraclitus, The Fragments of the Work of Heraclitus of Ephesus on Nature,trans, from the Greek Text of Bywater with a critical and historical intro. by G. T. W. Patrick (Baltimore: N. Muroy, 1889), Frag. I. All references to Heraclitus’ Fragments are taken from Patrick’s use of Bywater’s texts and will be noted in the text by a reference only to the Fragment numbers given by the authors cited.
Ibid., p. 21.
Alfred N. Whitehead, Process and Reality, in An Anthology, Selected by F. S. C. Northrop and Mason W. Gross (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953), PP. 567–8.
Rasvihary Das, The Philosophy of Whitehead (New York: Russell and Russell, 1964), P. 9.
Henri Bergson. Creative Evolution, trans, by Arthur Mitchell (New York: Random House, 1944), p. 215. Hereafter referred to as: CE.
Patrick, in introduction to The Fragments of Heraclitus, pp. 63–4.
Bergson, CE, p. 58.
Ibid., p. 259.
Ibid.
Bergson, CE, pp. 221, 227–9, 267.
Alfred N. Whitehead, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1930), p. 112.
Whitehead, Process and Reality, in An Anthology, p. 588.
Ibid., p. 639.
Ibid., p. 641.
For a comprehensive study of the character of continuity refer to my dissertation: Bergson’s Meaning of Continuity, Tulane University, 1972.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidtke, C.R. (1975). A Crossroads for Process Philosophy. In: Whittemore, R.C. (eds) Studies in Process Philosophy II. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1385-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1385-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1820-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1385-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive