Abstract
Practical problems arising in radar, sonar and seismology have stimulated extensive research in the area of array processing during the past two decades. This paper is not a review in the sense that it attempts to give a balanced presentation of the various elegant and highly mathematical analyses which have contributed to an understanding of arrays. It is the author’s feeling that array processing as a field has now matured to the point where a number of fairly simple intuitive notions can be abstracted from the more formal studies. We will be concerned with these intuitive notions, with questions like: What have we learned and why are these conclusions plausible? For formal proofs the interested reader will be referred to the, by now, very extensive literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, V. C. Digital Army Phasing JASA 32, 867, July 1960.
Bryn, F. Optimal Signal Processing of Three-dimensional Arrays Operating on Gaussian Signals and Noise JASA 34, 289, March 1962.
Vanderkulk, W. Optimum Processing for Acoustic Arrays. J. Brit. IRE Vol. 26, October 1963.
Anderson, V. C. DICANNE, A Realizable Adaptive Process. JASA 45, 398, February, 1969.
Anderson, V. C. and Rudnick, P. Rejection of Coherent Arrival at an Array JASA 45, 406, February, 1969.
Papoulis, A. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, Section 13.1 McGraw - Hill 1965.
Edelblute, D. J., Fisk, J. M. and Kinnison, G. L. Criteria for Optimum Signal Detection Theory for Arrays, JASA 41, 199, January, 1967.
Bangs, W. J. Array Processing with Generalized Beamformers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, 1971 (also available as a technical report Naval Underwater Systems Center, New London, Conn. September, 1971 )
Cox, H. Array Processing Against Interference. Symposium on Information Processing, Purdue University 1969. p. 453.
Wiener, N. Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series, Wiley, 1949.
Kanefsky, M. Detection of Weak Signals with Polarity Coincidence Arrays. IEEE Trans, on Information Theory, IT-12, 260, April, 1966.
Kanefsky, M. Progress reports No. 26 (Suboptimai techniques employing hard limiting for detecting passive sonar targets in the presence of interference) and No. 28 (Optimal techniques employing quantized inputs for detecting passive sonar targets in the presence of interference), Yale University, Department of Engineering and Applied Science, November, 1965, April, 1966 ( SUBIC program )
Schultheiss, P. M. Likelihood Ratio Detection of Gaussian Signals with Noise Varying from Element to Element of the Receiving Array. Progress report No. 11, Yale University, Department of Engineering and Applied Science, January, 1964 ( SUBIC program )
Cox, H. Sensitivity Considerations in Adaptive Beam Forming. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Signal Processing, Loughborough 1972, P. 619.
Huber, P. J. A Robust Version of the Probability Ratio Test Ann. Math. Stat. 36, 1753, December, 1965.
Schultheiss, P. M. and Wolcin J. J. Robust Sequential Probability Ratio Detectors. EASCON 1975 Convention Record, p. 36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schultheiss, P.M. (1977). Some Lessons from Array Processing Theory. In: Tacconi, G. (eds) Aspects of Signal Processing. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 33-1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1223-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1223-2_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1225-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1223-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive