Skip to main content

The Reality Game

  • Chapter
Adaptive Knowing
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

In this study I propose to suggest the lines of investigation which ought to be taken by anyone wishing to determine whether some of the ideas discovered in the theory of games, supported by the philosophy of culture and the theory of finite automata, can be productively employed in epistemology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton, 1947, University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurt Gödel, The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis (Princeton, 1940, University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurt Gödel, The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis (Princeton, 1940, University Press), p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feibleman, J.K. (1976). The Reality Game. In: Adaptive Knowing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1032-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1032-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1890-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1032-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics