Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAIV,volume 4))

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

In general, environmental stressors are chemical, physical, or biological agents capable of causing adverse effects on human health, safety, or the environment. Historically, the field of environmental risk assessment has focused primarily on the human health effects of chemical toxicants. The environmental risks posed by physical stressors, such as radiation, flood, drought, and fire, have also been assessed to a significant extent. Formal, quantitative risk assessment for biological stressors, however, is a nascent field of scientific analysis. Although the bounds of scientific uncertainty for risk assessment of chemical contaminants may span multiple orders of magnitude, the underlying principles, methods, data, and conventions for chemical risk assessment are far more developed than are those for the assessment of biological stressors. The main difference between chemical and biological stressors are that biological organisms: (a) grow, reproduce, and may multiply; (b) disperse both actively and passively, often in “jumps” that are hard to predict; (c) interact with ecosystems in ways that can be complex and are hard, if not impossible, to predict; and (d) evolve, and this evolution is largely random [1]. Some biological hazards combine elements of both biological and chemical risks. Staphylococcal food poisoning, for example, is not an infection but results from the production of a heat-stable chemical toxin by Staphylococcus aureus. The quantity of the toxin present in food, however, is a function of staphylococcal growth. To appreciate the novel risk assessment challenges posed by biological stressors, consider that chemical contaminants present below analytical detection limits typically pose negligible risks.

Article FootNote

The opinions expressed herein are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simberloff, D. and Alexander, M. (1994) Biological stressors, in Ecological Risk Assessment Issue Papers (EPA/630/R-94/009), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1993) Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States (OTA-F-565), U.S. Govemment Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdaleet al.(2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and controlIssues in Ecology5 (Available at: http://esa.scsc.edu/issues5.htm).

  4. Baskin, Y. (1996). Curbing undesirable invaders, BioScience 46732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts, D. and DeRemer, K. (1997) Overview of foreign technical barriers to U.S. agricultural exports. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Staff Paper AGES9705. (Abstract and ordering information available at:http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/ers/ages9705.html).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Risk management and the world trading system: regulating international trade distortions caused by national sanitary and phytosanitary policies, in Incorporating Science Economics and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade. Proceedings of a Conference National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 118–169.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williamson, M. (1992) Environmental risks from the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the need for molecular ecology Molecular Ecology 1 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wrubel, R., Krimsky, S., and Wetzler, R (1992) Field testing transgenic plants: an analysis of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Environmental Assessments BioScience 42 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McEvoy, P. (1996) Host specificity and biological pest controlBioScience 46(Available at: http://www2.aibs.org/aibs/bioscience/vol46/jun96.mckevoy.html).

  10. Culotta, E. (1995). Minimum population grows larger Science 270 31–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pulliam, H. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation, American Naturalist 132 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hastings, A. and Higgins, K. (1994) Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models Science 263 1133–1136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Jong, M. (1992). Risk assessment for the application of biological control of a forest weed by a common plant pathogenic fungus Risk Analysis 12 465–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pielou, E. (1979) Biogeography Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baker, H. (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds”, in H. Baker and G. Stebbins (eds.) The Genetics of Colonizing Species Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, C.S., Lonsdale, W.M., and Fortune, J. (1999) When to ignore advice: invasion predictions and decision theory Biological Invasions 1, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reichard, S.H., and Hamilton, C.W. (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America Conservation Biology 11 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodell, K., Parker, I.M., Gilbert, G.S. (2000) Biological impacts of species invasions: implications for policymakers, in Incorporating Science Economics >and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade. Proceedings of a ConferenceNational Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 87–117.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moffat, A. (1994) Theoretical ecology: winning its spurs in the real world Science 263 1090–1092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. May, R. and Oster, G. (1976) Bifurcations and dynamics complexity in simple ecological models American Naturalist 110 573–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Neill, R., Gardner, R. and Weller, D. (1982) Chaotic models as representations of ecological systems American Naturalist 120 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen, T., Bartell, S., and Koonce, J. (1977) Multiple stable configurations in ordination of phytoplankton community change rates Ecology 58 1076–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. May, R. (ed.) (1981)Theoretical EcologySinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bartell, S., Gardner, R., and O’Neill, R. (1992) Ecological Risk Estimation Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Powell, M., Ebel, E., Schlosser, S. et al. (forthcoming) Dose-response envelope for Escherichia coli O157:H7, Quantitative Microbiology (accepted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Griffin, P.M. (1995) Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. in: M.J. Blaser, P.D. Smith, J.I. Ravdin, et al. (eds.), Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Raven Press Ltd, New York, pp. 739–761.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levine, M. M., Dupont, H. L., Formal, S. B. et al. (1973) Pathogenesis of Shigella dysenteriae 1 (Shiga) dysentery Journal of Infectious Disease 127, 261–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Levine, M.M., Bergquist, E.J., Nalin, D.R. et al. (1978) Escherichia coli strains that cause diarrhoea but do not produce heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxins and are non-invasive Lancet 1, 1119–1122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Bieber, Ramer, S.W., Wu, C.-Y. et al. (1998) Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Science 280, 2114–2118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Haas, C. (1983) Estimation of risk due to low doses of microorganisms: a comparison of alternative methodologiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology 118573–582.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Regli, S., Rose, J.B., Haas, C.N., and Gerba, C.P. (1991) Modeling the risk from giardia and viruses in drinking water Journal of the American Water Works Association 83 76–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vose, D. (1996) Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Campbell, C.L. and Madden, L.V. (1990) Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powell, M.R. (2001). Risk Assessment for Biological Stressors. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks. NATO Science Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0024-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0987-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics