Abstract
In the course of history and its culmination in the present, we have learned several important lessons about the philosophical procedure. First of all, we have seen that the semantic system of language cannot determine what a given philosophical inquiry aims at, since any new insight or fresh flight of creative imagination would disrupt the semantic logic of the system in the effort to reach further areas. The system assumed at the start of an inquiry has inevitably to be transformed or replaced by another that emerges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. S. Peirce,“Evolutionary Love” in Morris R. Cohen (ed.), Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Papers, by the Lote Charles S. Peirce (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1923).
Cornelis A. van Peursen, “Creativity and the Method of the Sciences: A Problematic Issue in Husserl’s Phenomenology” in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (ed.), The Phenomenology of Man and of the Human Condition, Part I: Plotting the Territoryfor Interdisciplinary Communication, Analecta Husserliana 14 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 375–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tymieniecka, AT. (2000). Following the Logos Through the Labyrinth of Life. In: Impetus and Equipoise in the Life-Strategies of Reason. Analecta Husserliana, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0946-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0946-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6731-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0946-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive