Abstract
It was argued in Chapter 1 that science education and technology education should both be as ‘authentic’ as possible and that modelling and models, for which a typology was proposed, can form a bridge between the two. However, modelling and models must be seen within a broader context, that of the relationship between notions of ‘reality’, ‘theory’ and ‘model’, for two reasons. First, science education, which aspires to be authentic, must be based on an historically and philosophically valid view of the nature of science, in which these three notions play important parts. Second, it can be argued that perhaps, to some extent and in some way, the development of ideas by an individual parallels (or can be seen as a metaphor for) the development of ideas in science. The treatment of the reality/theory/model relationship given in this Chapter, which is of importance in its own right, is set within the second of these two reasons because it subsumes the first.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, J.K., Pietrocola, M., Zylbersztajn, A., Franco, C. (2000). Science and Education: Notions of Reality, Theory and Model. In: Gilbert, J.K., Boulter, C.J. (eds) Developing Models in Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6772-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0876-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive