Abstract
Good quality hydrological models are available to establish the water balance over large regions. A precise spatial representation of the entries of the water cycle such as the rainfalls, is then a crucial condition to obtain reliable and accurate results. However, it is not always easy to get a representative rainfall map, particularly in rugged terrain where the spatial structure of the rainfall is complex.
Two geostatistical methods that mix rainfall and topographical data when interpolating rainfall are applied: Kriging with External Drift and Collocated Cokriging. They are compared to a third method based on a multi-linear regression from a directional pararneterisation of the topography. Particular attention is paid to two points: the role played by the pre-processing of the Digital Elevation Model, particularly its smoothing.
The statistical analysis of the results obtained from several series of rainfall measurements (monthly to multi-annual data) allows us to draw some preliminary conclusions in the scope of determining optimal and automatic procedures for calculating rainfall fields.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nicolau R., Ribeiro L., Rodrigues R.R., Pereira H.G. and Câmara A.S. 2000. Mapping the spatial Distribution of Rainfall in Portugal, Proceedings of Geostats 2000 Cape Town. To be published.
Daly, C., Neilson, R. P. and Phillips D. L. 1994. A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33 pp 140–149.
Humbert J., Perron L., Perrin J.L., 1997. Precipitation mapping in mountainous area. Comparison of two statistical models. Proceedings of International Conference « Developments in Hydrology of Mountainous areas». FRIEND-AMHY- IHP V. High Tatras, Slovakia, Technical Documents in Hydrology n° 8, UNESCO Paris, pp. 70–75
Humbert j., Drogue G.and Mahr N. 1998: Cartographie des précipitations par paramétrisation omnidirectionnelle du relief: la méthode Pluvia. In Actes du 1 lème Colloque International de Climatologie (AIC), Lille, 2-5/9/98, vol. 11, pp. 259–266.
Pardo-Igúzquiza E., 1998. ‘Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating the areal average climatological rainfall mean using data on precipitation and topography’, Inter. J. Climato., 18, pp. 1031–1047.
Prudhomme C., Reed D.W., 1998. ‘Relationships Between Extreme Daily Precipitation and Topography in a Mountainous Region: A Case Study in Scotland’. Inter. J. Climato., 18, 1439–1453.
Goovaerts P. 2000, Geostatistical Approaches for Incorporating Elevation into the Spatial Interpolation of Rainfall Journal of Hydrology, 228,113–129.
Bleines C., Perseval S., Rambert F., Renard D. and Touffait Y. 2000. ISATIS Software Manual, Géovariances Fontainebleau, 585 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deraisme, J., Humbert, J., Drogue, G., Freslon, N. (2001). Geostatistical Interpolation of Rainfall in Mountainous Areas. In: Monestiez, P., Allard, D., Froidevaux, R. (eds) geoENV III — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0810-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0810-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7107-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0810-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive