Skip to main content

Abstract

The tensions between chemistry and medicine (or life science) are as old as chemistry itself. They were caused by enthusiastic alchemists who vied with nature or were accused of doing so. The promise of creating a living creature through laboratory operations survived the collapse of the alchemical tradition and profoundly shaped the public image of chemistry. The dichotomy between the laboratory and Nature as the creator of life was still at the center of literary images of chemists in the early nineteenth century. In her popular 1817 novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley revived the Promethean image of an all-powerful chemist. This image, which has created an association of chemistry with witchcraft, magic and charlatanism has persisted through the centuries in spite of the many successful and useful products that have issued from the chemist’s laboratory. As early as the eighteenth century, chemists began to substitute artificial, man-made products such as ammonia, oil of vitriol (sulphuric acid), and what they called “factitious” (that is, artificial) soda (sodium carbonate) for products formerly extracted from vegetable- or animal-matter. By the end of the eighteenth century chemistry was, therefore, celebrated as a useful science, contributing to public welfare and the wealth of nations. Chemists were no longer perceived as dangerous people. Rather they had become respectable professionals enjoying social recognition and, often, political responsibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. Ramberg, “ The Death of Vitalism and the Birth of Organic Chemistry: Wöhler’s Urea Synthesis and the Disciplinary Identity of Organic Chemistry”, Ambix 47 (2000) 170–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. John Hedley Brooke, “Wöhler’s Urea — a Verdict from the Chemists”, Ambix 15 (1968), reprinted in Brooke, Thinking about Matter. Studies in the History of Chemical Philosophy (Aldershot: Variorum, 1995) 84–114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claude Bernard, Introduction à l’ étude de la médecine experimental (Paris, 1865, re-edition Flammarion, 1984) 115–145.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcellin Berthelot, La Synthése chimique, 2e ed. (Paris: Alcan, 1876) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roald Hoffmann, “ In Praise of Synthesis”, in The Same and not the Same (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Susannah Handley, Nylon The Story of a Fashion Revolution (Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999); Jeffrey L. Meikle, American Plastic. A Cultural History (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1995); Susan T.I. Mossman and Peter J.T. Morris (eds), The Development of Plastics (London: The Science Museum, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. David J. Rhees, The Chemists’ Crusade, The Rise of an Industrial Science in Modern America, 1907–1922 (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1987); B. Schroeder-Gudehus (ed.), “Corporate Advertising, Public Relations and Popular Exhibits: The Case of Du Pont”, in Industrial Society and its Museums 1890–1990 (London: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1993) 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Susannah Handley, Nylon The Story of a Fashion Revolution (Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffrey L. Meikle, “Plastic, Material of a Thousand Uses”, in Joseph J. Corn (ed.), Imagining Tomorrow. History, Technology, and the American Future (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986) 77–96; idem, American Plastic. A Cultural History (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See “Plastics in 1940”, Fortune (October 22, 1940) 88–89 quoted by Jeffrey L. Meikle, “Into the Fourth Kingdom: Representations of Plastic Materials, 1920–1950”, Journal of Design History 5 (1992) 173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roland Barthes, Mythologies (Paris: Denoel-Gonthier, 1971) 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffrey L. Meikle, “Beyond Plastics: Postmodernity and the Culture of Synthesis,” Working paper No. 5 in David E. Nye, Charlotte Granly (eds), Odense American Studies International Series (Odense: Odense University, 1993) 1–15, quoted on 12. See also “American Plastics. A Cultural History”, op. cit. supra 277–305.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Technically the plastic era began in the 1970s when the volume of plastics used in the world superseded the volume of steel. A symbol of the plastic era is Disney World in particular at Epcot Center which opened in 1982 in Florida. Fiberglass reinforced polyester was used to make a careful replica of an Italian country house with stained and crumbling stucco (see Jeffrey L. Meikle, American Plastics 284–285).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See for instance the special issue of L’actualité chimique 11 (November 1999), entitled “Chimie et vie quotidienne”, especially Andrée Marquet’s paper “Je suis la clé de la vie”.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bryan Parkyn, “Fibre reinforced Composites”, in Susan T.I. Mossman and Peter J.T. Morris (eds), The Development of Plastics (London: The Science Museum, 1994) 105–114; Ivan Amato, Stuff: The Materials the World is Made of (New York: Basic Books, Harper Collins Publishers, 1997); B. Bensaude-Vincent, Eloge du mixte (Paris, Hachette littératures, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Originally the term “composite” was used in conjunction with “reinforced plastics”. The US Society for Plastic Industries had a Reinforced Plastics Division which was renamed Reinforced Plastics and Composites Division, in 1967. In France, a bi-monthly magazine entitled Plastique renforcé/Verre textile, published by the professionial organization bearing the same name, started in 1963 and was rechristened in 1983 Composites with Plastique renforcé/verre textile as a subtitle.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Philip H. Abelson and Allen L. Hammond (eds), Materials: Renewable and Nonrenewable resources (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976); Julian F.V Vincent, “Naturally New Materials”, Materials Today (1998 or 1999) 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Benyus, Biomimicry, Innovation inspired by Nature, Quill edition (New York: 1998); Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Hervé Arribart, Yves Bouligand and Clément Sanchez, “Chemists at the School of Nature”, Journal of European Chemistry 26 (January 2002) 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. A. Lowenstam and S. Weiner, On Biomineralization (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephen Mann, “Crystallochemical Strategies” in Stephen Mann, John Werbb and Robert J.P. Williams (eds), Biomineralization, Chemical and Biological Perspectives (Weinheim: VCH, 1989) 35–62, quoted on 35.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Weiner and L.I.A. Addadi, “Design Strategies in Mineralized Biological Materials”, Journal of Material Chemistry 7(5) (1997) 689–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. See for instance Julian F.V. Vincent in Materials Today (1998) 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Eric Drexler, Engines of Creation (New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roald Hoffmann, The Same and not the Same, op. cit. 85–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2002). Changing Images of Chemistry. In: Stamhuis, I.H., Koetsier, T., De Pater, C., Van Helden, A. (eds) The Changing Image of the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0587-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0587-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0587-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics