Abstract
For more than ten years now I have been engaged in clinical ethics consultation and, from the start, I have maintained an abiding concern to think through a method inherent to these activities. Two recommendations from the work of Edmund Husserl continue centrally to inform my pursuits. The first involves Husserl’s (1960, p. 7) suggestion that philosophers, “each for himself and in himself,” should at first “put out of action all the convictions we have been accepting up to now.” This suggestion also includes an invitation to “immerse ourselves” in the “scientific striving and doing” (Husserl, 1960, p. 9). For my part, this attitude of “immersing” pertains to the world of clinical medicine, specifically the moral experiences and difficulties that arise in that context. Crucial to this activity is adopting a rigorous reflective attitude, even while becoming immersed in the activities and practices that occur in clinical settings (Bliton and Finder, 1999, pp. 72–75).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Asch, A.: 1999, ‘Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy’, American Journal of Public Health 89, 1649–1657.
Beischer, N. A., Mackay, E. V. and Colditz, P.B.: 1997, Obstetrics and the Newborn: An Illustrated Textbook, 3rd Edition, Saunders, London.
Bltton, M.J. and Finder, S.G.: 1999, ‘Strange, but not stranger: The peculiar visage of philosophy in clinical ethics consultation’, Human Studies 22, 69–97.
Bliton, M.J. and Zaner, R.M.: Forthcoming, ‘Over the cutting edge: Moral complexity and ethics consultation in open-uterine fetal repair of spina bifida’, Journal of Clinical Ethics.
Bliton, M.J., Bruner, J.P., Zaner, R.M., et al.: (Forthcoming) ‘Guidelines for open fetal surai]gery for treatment of non-lethal malformations’, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.
Bruner, J.P., Richards, W.O., Tulipan, N.B., et al.: 1999, ‘Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomenigocele in utero,’ American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180, 153–158.
Bruner, J.P., Tulipan, N., Paschall R.L., et al.: 1999, ‘Fetal Surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus,’ The Journal of the American Medical Association 282, 1819–1825.
Bunch, W. H., Cass, A.S., Benson, A.S. et al.: 1972, Modern Management of Myelomeningocele, Warren H. Green, St. Louis.
Cairns, D.: 1973, ‘An approach to Husserlian phenomenology’, in F. Kersten and R.M. Zaner (eds.), Phenomenology, Continuation and Criticism: Essays in Memory of Dorian Cairns, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 224–238.
Campbell, N. (ed.): 2000, ‘Bad news and bedside manners’, Insights into Spina Bifida Vol. XI, No. 1(Jan/Feb), 1,8.
Casper, M.J.: 1998, The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Casper, M.J.: 1999, ‘Operation to the rescue: Feminist encounters with fetal surgery’, in L.M. Morgan and M. Michaels (ed.,) Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 101–112.
Davis, R.: Sept. 7, 1999, ‘Spinal surgery in womb tests faith, technology’, USA TODAY, p. 8D.
Duden, B.: 1993, Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Filly, R.A.: 2000, ‘Obstetrical sonography: The best way to terrify a pregnant woman’, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 19, 1–5.
Findlay, A.L.R.: 1984, Reproduction and the Fetus, Edward Arnold, London.
Fleischman, A.R., Chervenak, FA. and McCullough, L.B.: 1998, ‘The physician’s moral obligation to the pregnant woman, the fetus and the child’, Seminars in Perinatalogy 22, 184–188.
Fletcher, J.C. and Jonsen, A.R.: 1991, ‘Ethical considerations in fetal treatment’, in M.R. Harrison, M.S. Golbus and R.A. Filly (eds), The Unborn Patient, 2nd Edition, pp. 12–18.
Franklin, S.: 1991, ‘Fetal fascinations: new dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood’, in S. Franklin, C. Lury, and J. Stacey (eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies, Harper Collins, London, pp. 190–205.
Gregg, R.: 1995, Pregnancy in a High-Tech Age: Paradoxes of Choice, New York University Press, New York and London.
Harrison, M.R., Filly, R.A., and Golbus, M.S., et al: 1982 ‘Fetal treatment 1982’, New England Journal of Medicine, 307, 1651–1652.
Husserl, E.: 1982, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, F. Kersten (trans.), Martinus Nihoff Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London.
Husserl, E.: 1969, Formal and Transcendental Logic, D. Cairns (trans.) Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague.
Husserl, E.: 1960, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, D. Cairns (trans.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Jennings, R.W., Adzick, N.S. and Harrison, M.R.: 1992, ‘Fetal surgery’, in M.I. Evans (ed.), Reproductive Risks and Prenatal Diagnosis, Appelton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut, pp. 311–320.
Jerome, R. and Breu, G.: May 8, 2000, ‘Second chance for baby Ethan’, People 52, 60–65.
Jonas H.: 1974, Philosophical Essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Madsen, J.R., Estroff, J., and Levine, D.: 1998 “Prenatal neurosurgical diagnosis and counseling,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 9, 49–61.
Manchester, D., Clewell, W., Manco-Johnson, M., et al.: 1988, ‘Management of pregnancies with suspected fetal anomalies: Clinical experience and ethical issues’, in C. Nimrod and G. Griener (eds.), Biomedical Ethics and Fetal Therapy, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, California.
Michaels, M.W. and Morgan, L.M.: 1999, ‘Introduction: The fetal imperative’, in L.M. Morgan and M.W. Michaels (eds.), Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 1–9.
Morgan, L.M.: 1996, ‘Fetal relationality in feminist philosophy: An anthropological critique’, Hypatia 11, 47–70.
Murphy-Lawless, J.: 1998, Reading Birth and Death: A History of Obstetric Thinking, Cork University Press, Ireland.
Petchesky, R.P.: 1987, ‘Foetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction’, in M. Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 57–80.
Rapp, R.: 1997, ‘Real-time fetus: The role of the sonogram in the age of monitored reproduction’, in Cyborgs and Citadels: Anthropological Interventions in Emerging Sciences and Technologies, G.L. Downey, and J. Dumit, (eds.), School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp. 31–48.
Rothenberg, K.H. and Thomson, E.J. (eds.): 1994, Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
Sandelowski, M: 1994, ‘Separate, but less equal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood’, Gender & Society 8, 230–245.
Scarry, E.: 1985, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World, Oxford University Press, New York.
Schutz, A.: 1967a, ‘Choosing among projects of action’, in M. Natanson (ed.), The Problem of Social Reality, Vol. 1, Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 67–96.
Schutz, A.: 1967b, ‘Sender’s theory of intersubjectivity and the general thesis of the alter ego’, in M. Natanson (ed.), The Problem of Social Reality, Vol. 1, Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 150–179.
Schutz, A.: 1967c, ‘Sartre’s theory of the alter ego’, in M. Natanson (ed.), The Problem of Social Reality, Vol. 1, Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 180–203.
Schutz, A. and Luckman, T.: 1973, The Structures of the Life-World, Vol. 2, R.M. Zaner and D.J. Parent (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Shaaban, A.F., Kim, H.B., Milner, R., et al.: 1999, “The role of ultrasound in fetal surgery and invasive fetal procedures,” Seminars in Roentgenology, 34, 62–79.
Sheets-Johnstone, M.: 1994, The Roots of Power: Animate Form and Gendered Bodies, Open Court, Chicago.
Sherwin, S.: 1992, No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Simpson, J.L.: 1999, ‘Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: Promise, progress, and problems, Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1873–1874.
Spiegelberg, H.: 1980, ‘Putting ourselves into the place of others: Towards a phenomenology of imaginary self transposal’, Human Studies, 169–173.
Sutton, L.N., Adzick, N.S., Bilaniuk, L.T. et al.: 1999 ‘Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging followiing fetal surgery for myelomeningocele’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1826–1831.
Taylor, J.S.: 1998, ‘Image of contradiction: Obstetrical ultrasound in American culture’, in S. Franklin and H. Ragone (eds.), Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 15–45.
Wertz, D.C. and Fletcher, J.C.: 1993, ‘A critique of some feminist challenges to prenatal diagnosis,’ Journal of Women’s Health 2, 173–188.
Zaner, R.M.: 2000, ‘Discovering what matters in fetal surgery’ presented at the Fetal Surgery and the Moral Presence of the Fetus Conference at Vanderbilt University on March 11, 2000.
Zaner, R.M.: 1996, ‘Listening or telling? Thoughts on responsibility in clinical ethics consultation’, Theoretical Medicine 17, 255–277.
Zaner, R.M.: 1993, ‘Voices and time: The venture of clinical ethics’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18, 9–31.
Zaner, R.M.: 1988, Ethics and the Clinical Encounter, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Zaner, R.M.: 1970, The Way of Phenomenology: Criticism as a Philosophical Discipline, Peoasus New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bliton, M.J. (2001). Imagining a Fetus: Insights from Talking with Pregnant Women about their Decisions to Undergo Open-Uterine Fetal Surgery. In: Toombs, S.K. (eds) Handbook of Phenomenology and Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 68. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0536-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0536-4_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0200-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0536-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive